Comparison Overview

Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers

VS

Foundation House

Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers

110 Park Center Drive, None, Parkersburg, WV, US, 26101
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Evergreen is a unique program that helps children ages 5-18 learn positive new coping skills, self-regulation, how to manage their mental health in a positive way and how to stay resilient. We offer Group Therapy, Individual Therapy, Case Management as well at Intensive Outpatient Programing for children to grow and develop. We partner with other community agency to ensure that all clients get the services that they need and conduct monthly wraparound team meetings. On site we have the opportunity for the clients to learn in a classroom setting about skills and to practice them in real life. We have a Sensory Room and Play Therapy Room where clients can learn to self-regulate and express themselves through play. Our hardworking and dedicated staff attend a detailed onboarding training as well as receiving multiple update trainings throughout the course of their employment. This program is currently being offered for Wood County, West Virginia (surrounding counties can call the program to explore treatment options 681-588-0550). If you are a parent or a professional working with a child who is struggling and want to talk about treatment options, please call today and get more information. If you are professional and you are interested in learning about our program and any open positions that we currently have please reach out to us. We are excited to talk with you!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foundation House

160 Preble St, Portland, Maine, 04101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Foundation House has been a pioneer in the field of men's behavioral and mental health, substance abuse treatment, and our program continues to lead the way in quality of care. Combining evidence-based therapeutic practices, innovative programming, serene surroundings, and a nurturing environment, we offer an unmatched treatment journey. Our coordinated care transition bridges residential treatment to independent living. With an urban campus, and a 120-acre therapeutic ranch, our program provides truly unique resources blending urban and wilderness environments.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evergreen-therapeutic-treatment-centers.jpeg
Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-house.jpeg
Foundation House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foundation House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation House in 2026.

Incident History — Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foundation House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evergreen-therapeutic-treatment-centers.jpeg
Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-house.jpeg
Foundation House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foundation House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foundation House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company.

In the current year, Foundation House company and Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foundation House company nor Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foundation House company nor Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foundation House company nor Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company nor Foundation House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company nor Foundation House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foundation House company employs more people globally than Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Evergreen Therapeutic Treatment Centers nor Foundation House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N