Comparison Overview

Everest Court Reporting LLC

VS

The Sexton Law Firm

Everest Court Reporting LLC

100 N 18th st, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Everest Court Reporting LLC specializes in complex, multi-party, and multi-district litigation. National Coverage – Whether your deposition is in your office or another state, Everest has you covered with seamless coordination of depositions in any part of the country. We are designed to handle all the challenges of complex commercial litigation, intellectual property, pharmaceutical, securities, and patent litigation anywhere your case takes you. Online repository – 24/7 access to your transcripts, exhibits, calendars, and invoices. Experience you need. Results you want.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Sexton Law Firm

3130 Bonita Rd, Chula Vista, CA, 91910, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Sexton Law Firm is a Chula Vista-based law firm practicing in personal injury and workers’ compensation cases. The firm concentrates much of its practice in helping clients who have suffered injuries due to someone else’s negligence navigate the workers’ compensation or personal injury claims processes. Their lawyers work to attain the maximum amount of benefits owed to a client as efficiently and effectively as possible and can also assist with appeals when an initial claim is denied. The firm also offers bankruptcy and estate planning services and is committed to the long-term success of its clients. They emphasize helping clients understand the costs and benefits of each potential course of action so that they can make informed decisions built on decades of legal experience. The Sexton Law Firm offers free initial consultations and offers its services in English and Spanish. James F. Sexton and his staff have a combined 80 years of experience in the legal industry and are passionate about exceeding your expectations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/everest-court-reporting.jpeg
Everest Court Reporting LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jamessextonlaw.jpeg
The Sexton Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Everest Court Reporting LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Sexton Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Everest Court Reporting LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Sexton Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Everest Court Reporting LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Everest Court Reporting LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Sexton Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Sexton Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/everest-court-reporting.jpeg
Everest Court Reporting LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jamessextonlaw.jpeg
The Sexton Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Sexton Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Everest Court Reporting LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Sexton Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Everest Court Reporting LLC company.

In the current year, The Sexton Law Firm company and Everest Court Reporting LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Sexton Law Firm company nor Everest Court Reporting LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Sexton Law Firm company nor Everest Court Reporting LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Sexton Law Firm company nor Everest Court Reporting LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC company nor The Sexton Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC company nor The Sexton Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Everest Court Reporting LLC company employs more people globally than The Sexton Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Everest Court Reporting LLC nor The Sexton Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X