Comparison Overview

EV Initiative Inc.

VS

area 91

EV Initiative Inc.

2108 N St, Sacramento, 95816, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://evinitiative.com

Company Description: EV Initiative is a B2B SaaS business; our technology enables Charge Port Operators (CPOs)—third-party organizations that are creating and maintaining EV Charging Networks—to establish their EV-related businesses. What’s a CPO? The entities grow and maintaining Electric Vehicle (EV) charging networks. CPOs are plenty; utilities, property owners and managers, fleet operators, solar and electrical, quick service restaurants, corporate, hospitality, government. and more. Our mission is to Enable the Next Generation. We provide the platform for CPOs with EV initiative. Our offerings: • Charge Port Management Software (CPMS) - the operating system for EV Charging Networks, we white label for our customers • Point-of-Sale Driver App - white labeled for CPOs • EV Initiative Hardware Shop - EV Charging Stations (EVCS) for CPOs • Additional services: CPO sales and marketing bundles

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

area 91

Rötelbachstraße 91, None, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 89079
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://area91.de/

Die rubinion area 91 ist ein New Work Space, das Bürogebäude der Zukunft. Egal ob Sie einen zeitlich befristeten Arbeitsplatz, eine flexible Arbeitsumgebung oder einen Rückzugsraum suchen, hier finden Sie alles. Wir ermöglichen alle modernen Ansätze zur Gestaltung von Arbeitsplätzen in einem modernen Gebäude mit Passivhausstandard. In der rubinion area 91 finden Sie: • Multi Space Working • Coworking Areas • Event Space • Leisure and Fitness Area

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ev-initiative.jpeg
EV Initiative Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/area-91.jpeg
area 91
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EV Initiative Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
area 91
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EV Initiative Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for area 91 in 2025.

Incident History — EV Initiative Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EV Initiative Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — area 91 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

area 91 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ev-initiative.jpeg
EV Initiative Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/area-91.jpeg
area 91
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

area 91 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EV Initiative Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, area 91 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EV Initiative Inc. company.

In the current year, area 91 company and EV Initiative Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither area 91 company nor EV Initiative Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither area 91 company nor EV Initiative Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither area 91 company nor EV Initiative Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. company nor area 91 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EV Initiative Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to area 91 company.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. nor area 91 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References