Comparison Overview

EUROSTAMPA

VS

Walker360

EUROSTAMPA

Viale Rimembranza 20, Bene Vagienna, Cuneo, 12041, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Eurostampa, founded in Piedmont in 1966, is a family company and a leading manufacturer of quality labels for the wine & spirits, chocolate, food and cosmetics industries. Luciano Cillario, the founder, leads the company with his sons Gianmario, Giuseppe and Gian Franco. Step by step the company, always focused on internationalization, has been able to reach new markets thanks to six locations in Italy, USA - Ohio, California - UK, France and Mexico. From Langa's wine producer, to the prestigious Champagne mansion, to the major leading groups in spirits (whisky, vodka, gin, rhum, ...), chocolate, food and cosmetics productions. Eurostampa serves customers around the world. Over the years, the secret of the company’s success has been the ability to keep pace and never ceasing to evolve: our Research and Development into new printing technologies, our continuous innovation plus our attention to our employees has always been Eurostampa’s strengths. Innovation LABels is the Eurostampa department devoted to the development of new ideas and the search for innovative solutions, materials and technologies, for clients and graphic agencies, both in the creation of new design and label restyling.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 528
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Walker360

2501 E 5th Street, Montgomery, AL, 36107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Most print companies know two things: paper and ink. At Walker360, our expertise covers every range of marketing. From print and digital services to direct mail and variable data, we’re trained to help you find the right media for your message and add professional finishing touches to each of your projects. With over 75 years of experience in print, and a staff that is Google certified in cutting edge digital techniques, Walker360 gives you the tools you need to help your businesses succeed. Reach out and experience firsthand the service and expertise that has made us part of the top 1% of printing companies in the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurostampa-s-p-a.jpeg
EUROSTAMPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker360.jpeg
Walker360
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EUROSTAMPA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Walker360
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EUROSTAMPA in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker360 in 2025.

Incident History — EUROSTAMPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EUROSTAMPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Walker360 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker360 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurostampa-s-p-a.jpeg
EUROSTAMPA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker360.jpeg
Walker360
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EUROSTAMPA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Walker360 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Walker360 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EUROSTAMPA company.

In the current year, Walker360 company and EUROSTAMPA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Walker360 company nor EUROSTAMPA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Walker360 company nor EUROSTAMPA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Walker360 company nor EUROSTAMPA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EUROSTAMPA company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EUROSTAMPA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Walker360 company.

EUROSTAMPA company employs more people globally than Walker360 company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EUROSTAMPA nor Walker360 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L