Comparison Overview

Eurekadoc

VS

TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn

Eurekadoc

Kemp House, London, undefined, EC1V 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Eurekadoc specialises in producing diverse medical career guides for Doctors. We meticulously research the very best 'niche' professions and even go undercover to obtain expert advice, and the insider tips & tricks that will help you to succeed. Written by doctors, for doctors, you can be certain we have your best interests at heart. When you read our career guides, we want you to say EUREKA!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn

55 King St E, Thornbury, Ontario, N0H 2P0, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

TechnoKids Inc. publishes K-12 technology projects, which are project-based curriculum units. Each technology project has a teacher guide, student workbook, and resources. Differentiate instruction with customizable quizzes, templates, example files, certificates, parent letters, and marking sheets or rubrics. TechnoKids has over forty projects with lessons for Microsoft Office, Google, Adobe, KidBlog, Scratch, Scratch Jr, Python and HTML. You can purchase one project, a set, or the entire collection. Keep your lessons up to date by downloading the latest version from the online TechnoKids Library. Engage learners with meaningful activities. TechnoKids instructional materials can be used by classroom teachers, home school parents, or learning center instructors. The lesson plans integrate into a computer class, curriculum unit, workshop series, or after school program. The instructional materials are digital which allows them to be used within the Google Classroom or embedded into a OneNote Class Notebook. Let’s connect! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/technokidscomputercurriculum/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TechnoKidsComputerCurriculum Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.ca/technokids/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/technokidsinc

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurekadoc-publishing.jpeg
Eurekadoc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technokids-inc-.jpeg
TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eurekadoc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eurekadoc in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn in 2025.

Incident History — Eurekadoc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eurekadoc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurekadoc-publishing.jpeg
Eurekadoc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technokids-inc-.jpeg
TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eurekadoc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eurekadoc company.

In the current year, TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company and Eurekadoc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company nor Eurekadoc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company nor Eurekadoc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company nor Eurekadoc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eurekadoc company nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eurekadoc company nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn company employs more people globally than Eurekadoc company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eurekadoc nor TechnoKids | K-12 Project-Based Lessons | Google, Microsoft, Coding, Adobe, Blogging | LinkedIn holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.