Comparison Overview

EthosVO

VS

AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc.

EthosVO

White House Rd, · Merstham, RH1 3AE, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ethosvo.org

EthosVO is a network of social entrepreneurs and innovators. We help people and organisations drive incredible social and environmental outcomes. Come and play with us! We believe that working collaboratively, approaching others with trust and openness and the moderation of self-interest make sustainable solutions possible. Founded in 1999 by Robert Pye and Tony Clarke, Ethos is not like most companies – we don’t have a standard hierarchy or office space. What connects us is our strong values, shared objectives, a vision of a new and better way of working, and communications technology (as well as regular face-to-face business and social events).

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc.

83 Maiden Lane, New York, NY, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ahrcNYCfoundation.org

The AHRC New York City Foundation is a fund-raising and grant-making entity that supports programs for children and adults who have intellectual and developmental disabilities and who live in New York City. The Foundation is the primary source of philanthropic support for AHRC New York City, which provides a wide array of social services for 15,000 people annually. Our mission Through its grants, the Foundation aims to empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to • Make choices and decisions based on their own aspirations. • Live as independently and be as productive as possible. • Participate fully in their communities.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethos-vo-ltd.jpeg
EthosVO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ahrc-new-york-city-foundation-inc-.jpeg
AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EthosVO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EthosVO in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — EthosVO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EthosVO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethos-vo-ltd.jpeg
EthosVO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ahrc-new-york-city-foundation-inc-.jpeg
AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EthosVO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EthosVO company.

In the current year, AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company and EthosVO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company nor EthosVO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company nor EthosVO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company nor EthosVO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EthosVO company nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EthosVO company nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EthosVO company employs more people globally than AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EthosVO nor AHRC New York City Foundation, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References