Comparison Overview

Estudio Lipina

VS

Secret Ink Studio

Estudio Lipina

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Estudio de Fotografía Publicitaria. Desarrollo de tomas de producto de pequeño y mediano porte, gastronomía, retratos, beauty, campañas y catálogos de indumentaria, etc. El estudio está equipado tecnológicamente con un vasto equipo de luces, accesorios, cámaras digitales de alta resolución y ópticas de alta gama que posibilitan alta calidad cromática y resolutiva tanto como factores de ampliación que abarcan las mayores exigencias de impresión desde avisos de página y doble página hasta piezas para vía pública.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Secret Ink Studio

via Alessandro Poerio 80, Rome, 00152, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Artistic portraits shot in our Rome studio, or digitally manipulated from a client’s photo. Complete photographic portfolio shot at client’s chosen location, artistic wedding shoots and other family occasions or professional events. Artistic photo albums shot, printed and bound, footages and slideshows, DVD-Videos for presentations, web galleries (web sites including photographic portfolio). Original frames and artistic finishing-touches for photographic portraits (including printing and mounting) to decorate your home. Apple software based courses for beginners and advanced students. The RAW photographic standard processed with Aperture is the base for our digital photo production. Photos are shot in FotoRoma’s sophisticated photographic studio with all the most modern technology and lighting equipment at the photographer’s disposal. The artistic studio situated in via Poerio, Rome is also a multimedial, fully digitally equipped environment.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/estudio-lipina.jpeg
Estudio Lipina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/secret-ink-studio.jpeg
Secret Ink Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Estudio Lipina
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Secret Ink Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Estudio Lipina in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Secret Ink Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Estudio Lipina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Estudio Lipina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Secret Ink Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Secret Ink Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/estudio-lipina.jpeg
Estudio Lipina
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/secret-ink-studio.jpeg
Secret Ink Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Estudio Lipina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Secret Ink Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Secret Ink Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Estudio Lipina company.

In the current year, Secret Ink Studio company and Estudio Lipina company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Secret Ink Studio company nor Estudio Lipina company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Secret Ink Studio company nor Estudio Lipina company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Secret Ink Studio company nor Estudio Lipina company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Estudio Lipina company nor Secret Ink Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Estudio Lipina company nor Secret Ink Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Secret Ink Studio company employs more people globally than Estudio Lipina company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Estudio Lipina nor Secret Ink Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N