Comparison Overview

Esthetic Collective

VS

Lovely Giant Productions

Esthetic Collective

undefined, Atlanta, Georgia, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Founded in 2013 by young creatives, Girardo G. & Javon M., Esthetic Collective was birthed in a sincere effort to bring quality art to the people. We firmly stand by the beliefs that photo & video have the capacity to evoke profound emotional experiences; As such, out of deep respect for the craft, we invest our hearts into the very essence of these art forms.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lovely Giant Productions

undefined, Brooklyn, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

http://lovelygiant.com LovelyGIANT is a full-service production company focused on commercial print, digital, and motion content for top brands and artists worldwide. With our decades long experience, we are expert in collaborating with our clients to achieve their vision. We leverage our national and global resources to ensure the highest quality production within your budget. Executive Producer Inna Khavinson brings 21 years of leadership, production, photo editing, creative development and art producing experience to the advertising, editorial and fashion communities. Her past experience as a photo editor and art producer at some of NYC's top companies sets the foundation for Lovely Giant's approach. We recognize every job is unique and rise to the challenge of the most demanding projects with a low stress and can-do approach. We are creative, we are resourceful, we are goal driven and dialed in to every detail. We are LovelyGIANT. If you can imagine it happening, we’ll make sure it does. Capabilties: Pre Production, Post Production & Shoot Scheduling Art Buying, Estimating, Bidding & Budget Management Casting, Talent Bookings & Payroll Celebrity Coordination & Special Services Crew + Styling Recommendations & Bookings BTS Documentation (Motion + Stills) Payroll Services Covid Compliance Certified & Covid Testing & Staffing Equipment Management & Booking Location Scouting, Research, Permitting & Management Permits & Insurance Location Vehicles Travel Management, Bookings & Logistics International Customs, Travel Carnet and Visa Coordination Security Services Catering and Craft Services Shoot Supervision

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/estheticcollective.jpeg
Esthetic Collective
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovely-giant-productions.jpeg
Lovely Giant Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Esthetic Collective
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lovely Giant Productions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Esthetic Collective in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lovely Giant Productions in 2025.

Incident History — Esthetic Collective (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Esthetic Collective cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lovely Giant Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lovely Giant Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/estheticcollective.jpeg
Esthetic Collective
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovely-giant-productions.jpeg
Lovely Giant Productions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Esthetic Collective company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lovely Giant Productions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lovely Giant Productions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Esthetic Collective company.

In the current year, Lovely Giant Productions company and Esthetic Collective company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lovely Giant Productions company nor Esthetic Collective company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lovely Giant Productions company nor Esthetic Collective company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lovely Giant Productions company nor Esthetic Collective company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Esthetic Collective company nor Lovely Giant Productions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Esthetic Collective company nor Lovely Giant Productions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lovely Giant Productions company employs more people globally than Esthetic Collective company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Esthetic Collective nor Lovely Giant Productions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N