Comparison Overview

Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne

VS

Solomon Law Group, P.A.

Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne

3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Dallas, Texas, 75219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne is a Dallas-based law firm dedicated to providing superior, client-focused legal services. Our lawyers draw upon decades of big-firm experience, including representing Fortune 100 companies and other high-profile clients around the country. We are proud to be a Certified Women’s Business Enterprise (WBE) and a member of National Association of Minority and Woman Owned Law Firms (NAMWOLF). Our legal services include: • Business litigation strategy • Support and counsel • Employment advice and defense litigation • Contractual drafting and negotiation • Business formation, acquisition and general business advice • Legal advocacy • General business risk management advice We have a high concentration of clients in the following industries: • Energy • Healthcare • Insurance • Construction • Telecommunications Awards & Recognition • 2013-2016 Best Law Firms (U.S. News/Best Lawyers®) • 2013 Top Ranked US Law Firms (LexisNexis Martindale- Hubbell), a distinction achieved by fewer than 1 percent of law firms nationwide, which indicates that one-third of the attorneys have achieved an AV® Preeminent™ peer-review rating • 2013 Go-To Law Firms for Top 500 Companies (Corporate Counsel magazine) • Best Lawyers in America® • Best Women Lawyers in Dallas, D Magazine • Winning Women Trial Attorneys, Texas Lawyer • Texas Super Lawyers • Texas Super Lawyers – Rising Stars • Top 100: 2013 Dallas/Fort Worth, Super Lawyers • Top 50 Women Lawyers in Texas, Texas Super Lawyers • Best Lawyers in Dallas, D Magazine • Best Lawyers in Texas

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Solomon Law Group, P.A.

1881 W Kennedy Blvd, Tampa, Florida, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Stanford R. Solomon, P.A. was formed on May 1, 1990 to provide the highest quality legal services to companies and individuals throughout the State and around the country. Now known as THE SOLOMON LAW GROUP, P.A., the firm serves a diverse range of clients which include several major banking institutions, many local and national corporations (both public and private), and individuals with varied business interests. The firm places particular emphasis on (a) prosecution and resolution of commercial disputes, (b) negotiation and documentation of real estate and business transactions, (c) work-out and restructuring of real estate and corporate lending relationships, (d) pursuit of legal malpractice claims and (e) foreclosure and disposition of secured assets. Matters handled by the firm also include the evaluation and resolution of loan relationships, real estate disputes, partnership disagreements, and business disruption claims. The firm prides itself on the ability to provide practical legal advice and counseling to clients at all stages of the most complex business transactions, including guidance designed to avert controversies before they mature and guidance to quell controversies after they erupt.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/estes-thorne-&-carr-pllc.jpeg
Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solomonlawgroup.jpeg
Solomon Law Group, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Solomon Law Group, P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solomon Law Group, P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Solomon Law Group, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solomon Law Group, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/estes-thorne-&-carr-pllc.jpeg
Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solomonlawgroup.jpeg
Solomon Law Group, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Solomon Law Group, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Solomon Law Group, P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company.

In the current year, Solomon Law Group, P.A. company and Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Solomon Law Group, P.A. company nor Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Solomon Law Group, P.A. company nor Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Solomon Law Group, P.A. company nor Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne company employs more people globally than Solomon Law Group, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Estes Thorne Ewing & Payne nor Solomon Law Group, P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X