Comparison Overview

Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone

VS

Advocacia Riedel

Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone

155 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone is a premier trial firm in Boston, MA that delivers innovative representation to its clients. We specialize in personal injury law, family and matrimonial law, medical malpractice, business disputes and property liability. Our attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best possible results for our clients, whether by jury verdict, settlement, arbitrator’s award or mediation. Employing civility, integrity and skill, our attorneys have established appellate law and obtained some of the largest verdicts and settlements in Massachusetts. The firm was founded in 1938 by civil litigation pioneers J. Newton Esdaile and his law school classmate, general practitioner Charles W. Barrett, Sr. Following in its founders'​ footsteps, the attorneys at Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone use creativity and innovation to further their clients’ interests, while setting precedent in the appellate courts of the Commonwealth. Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone received a National First-Tier ranking in the 2013 Edition of "Best Law Firms"​ by U.S. News-Best Lawyers in the area of Medical Malpractice Law-Plaintiffs, and is regularly recognized as Boston First-Tier in the areas of Family Law, Medical Malpractice Law-Plaintiffs and Personal Injury Litigation-Plaintiffs. Our lawyers have been featured in such publications as Super Lawyers, Lawdragon 500, Best Lawyers in America, Rated as AV® Preeminent™ as a result of Martindale Hubbell peer-review, and have held leadership positions in numerous legal organizations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advocacia Riedel

Brasília, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A história da Advocacia Riedel está diretamente ligada a de seu fundador, Ulisses Riedel de Resende, um dos mais prestigiados advogados trabalhistas do país. Fundada no Rio de Janeiro em 1959, foi transferida para Brasília em 1971, acompanhando o Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST). Sua missão é atuar de forma ética e eficiente na defesa jurídica dos interesses da sociedade, fundamentados na valorização do trabalho e da dignidade humana. Atualmente localizada no 13º andar do Edifício Liberty Mall, a Riedel é referência do Direito Trabalhista no Distrito Federal. Foi responsável pela criação de 60 entidades sindicais e de sete confederações de trabalhadores. Com valores pautados na ética, respeito e conhecimento especializado, seu nome consta em um grande número de processos que tramitam no TST, resultado da credibilidade e do reconhecimento construídos ao longo dos 56 anos de atuação. A Advocacia Riedel se destaca pela excelência na atuação profissional e no atendimento ao cliente. Na última década, além de se especializar nas causas trabalhistas, a empresa ramificou suas atividades e passou também a atender outras áreas do Direito: Sindical, Médico, Constitucional, Cível, Tributário, Previdenciário, Administrativo e Penal. O escritório une tradição e alto desempenho. A inovação e a utilização de soluções tecnológicas estão presentes na gestão dos processos que são 100% digitalizados. Essa metodologia garante rapidez e assertividade no andamento de milhares de ações e no objetivo de levar justiça a todas as classes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/esdaile-barrett-jacobs-&-mone.jpeg
Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocacia-riedel.jpeg
Advocacia Riedel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advocacia Riedel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advocacia Riedel in 2025.

Incident History — Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advocacia Riedel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advocacia Riedel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/esdaile-barrett-jacobs-&-mone.jpeg
Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocacia-riedel.jpeg
Advocacia Riedel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advocacia Riedel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Advocacia Riedel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company.

In the current year, Advocacia Riedel company and Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advocacia Riedel company nor Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Advocacia Riedel company nor Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advocacia Riedel company nor Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company nor Advocacia Riedel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Advocacia Riedel company.

Advocacia Riedel company employs more people globally than Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Esdaile, Barrett, Jacobs & Mone nor Advocacia Riedel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X