Comparison Overview

Erie County Medical Center Corporation

VS

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Erie County Medical Center Corporation

462 Grider St, Buffalo, New York, 14215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

ECMC is a medical leader that makes patient experience our first priority, and brings compassionate, first-class care to the eight counties of Western New York, as well as Southern Ontario. Our presence and care extend throughout our area, from our advanced academic medical center on our main campus with 602 inpatient beds, to our multiple specialized centers of excellence, to our Terrace View Long-Term Care Facility with 390 beds, to on- and off-campus primary care and family health centers. In addition, as a verified, designated Level 1 Adult Trauma Center as well as regional center for burn care, behavioral health services, transplantation, cancer care, and more, we work with some of the most critical patient cases in Western New York. With this combination of knowledgeable, experienced doctors, a wealth of research, and advanced technology, we’re proud to offer Western New York a healthier future—and prouder still to show our community the difference between healthcare and true care(TM).

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,797
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

55, Boulevard Diderot, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75012
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

AP-HP (Greater Paris University Hospitals) is a European world-renowned university hospital. Its 39 hospitals treat 8 million people every year: in consultation, emergency, during scheduled or home hospitalizations. The AP-HP provides a public health service for everyone, 24 hours a day. This mission is a duty as well as a great source of pride. AP-HP is the leading employer in the Greater Paris area: 100.000 staff members – doctors, researchers, paramedical staff, administrative personnel and workers – work there.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 20,296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erie-county-medical-center.jpeg
Erie County Medical Center Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ap-hp.jpeg
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Erie County Medical Center Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Erie County Medical Center Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP in 2025.

Incident History — Erie County Medical Center Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Erie County Medical Center Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erie-county-medical-center.jpeg
Erie County Medical Center Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2017
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ap-hp.jpeg
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Erie County Medical Center Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Erie County Medical Center Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has not reported any.

In the current year, Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company and Erie County Medical Center Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Erie County Medical Center Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company nor Erie County Medical Center Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company nor Erie County Medical Center Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation company nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation company nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company employs more people globally than Erie County Medical Center Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Erie County Medical Center Corporation nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L