Comparison Overview

ERD_Melbourne

VS

Collabra

ERD_Melbourne

306/118 Russell Street, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-02-19
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://erd.com.au

ERD has no house style. We go beyond the obvious. We bring discipline, experience and understanding. We explore the client’s world to seek meaningful insights. We place a premium on talent, chemistry, craft, precision and responsibility. Above all, we realise that each solution is unique and fresh because every challenge is different. Design can be beautiful, polished, considered, out there or invisible. But it's only ever right if it's right for you. We couldn't get up in the morning to peddle stale thinking, off the shelf solutions or pale imitations. Fresh design starts with fresh thinking. Every day.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Collabra

Esperantoplatsen 7-9, Göteborg, undefined, 411 19, SE
Last Update: 2026-03-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.collabra.se

Maximize the impact of branding on pack without all the technical fuss. Your packaging is by far the most important brand channel. Every potential customer comes in contact with your packaging when shopping and then brings it home, allowing you to keep communicating your brand every day. But packaging is also the media that’s most difficult and complicated to realize when it comes to management, implementation and print quality. Collabra handles Artwork Management and all technical aspects of pack design implementation, allowing you to focus entirely on branding. We do Artwork Management. Nothing else.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erd.jpeg
ERD_Melbourne
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/collabra.jpeg
Collabra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ERD_Melbourne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Collabra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERD_Melbourne in 2026.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Collabra in 2026.

Incident History — ERD_Melbourne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERD_Melbourne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Collabra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Collabra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erd.jpeg
ERD_Melbourne
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/collabra.jpeg
Collabra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Collabra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ERD_Melbourne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Collabra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ERD_Melbourne company.

In the current year, Collabra company and ERD_Melbourne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Collabra company nor ERD_Melbourne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Collabra company nor ERD_Melbourne company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Collabra company nor ERD_Melbourne company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ERD_Melbourne company nor Collabra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ERD_Melbourne company nor Collabra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Collabra company employs more people globally than ERD_Melbourne company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ERD_Melbourne nor Collabra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References