Comparison Overview

Equinox Open Library Initiative

VS

JFCS Holocaust Center

Equinox Open Library Initiative

P.O. Box 69, Norcross, 30091, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Equinox Open Library Initiative is a nonprofit company engaging in literary, charitable, and educational endeavors serving cultural and knowledge institutions. As the successor to Equinox Software, Inc., the Initiative carries forward a decade of service and experience with Evergreen and other open source library software. At Equinox OLI we help you empower your library with open source technologies.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JFCS Holocaust Center

2245 Post Street, San Francisco, 94115, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The JFCS Holocaust Center is dedicated to the remembrance, research, documentation and education about the Holocaust. As Northern California’s primary resource for education about the Holocaust and other genocides, our work increases awareness about Jewish history and the causes and consequences of antisemitism, racism, and bigotry. Through a deeper understanding of the Holocaust and patterns of genocide, our goal is to inspire moral courage and social responsibility in future generations. Our Preisler Shorenstein Institute reaches more than 20,000 public and private school students and educators each year. Our Tauber Holocaust Library houses more than 13,000 volumes, an archive of more than 2,000 recorded oral histories, and many rare artifacts, memorabilia, and images documenting the Holocaust. The JFCS Holocaust Center is a division of Jewish Family and Children’s Services of San Francisco, the Peninsula, Marin and Sonoma Counties.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equinox-open-library-initiative.jpeg
Equinox Open Library Initiative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holocaust-center.jpeg
JFCS Holocaust Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Equinox Open Library Initiative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JFCS Holocaust Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Equinox Open Library Initiative in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JFCS Holocaust Center in 2025.

Incident History — Equinox Open Library Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Equinox Open Library Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JFCS Holocaust Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JFCS Holocaust Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equinox-open-library-initiative.jpeg
Equinox Open Library Initiative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holocaust-center.jpeg
JFCS Holocaust Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

JFCS Holocaust Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Equinox Open Library Initiative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

JFCS Holocaust Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Equinox Open Library Initiative company has not reported any.

In the current year, JFCS Holocaust Center company and Equinox Open Library Initiative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JFCS Holocaust Center company nor Equinox Open Library Initiative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

JFCS Holocaust Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Equinox Open Library Initiative company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JFCS Holocaust Center company nor Equinox Open Library Initiative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative company nor JFCS Holocaust Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JFCS Holocaust Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Equinox Open Library Initiative company.

Equinox Open Library Initiative company employs more people globally than JFCS Holocaust Center company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Equinox Open Library Initiative nor JFCS Holocaust Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H