Comparison Overview

EPUBLIC Korea

VS

Interforum Canada

EPUBLIC Korea

KR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

E*PUBLIC’s business can be classified into two large mainstream activities: import and distribution of ELT books and medical books. By signing an exclusive Korean distributorship agreement with Oxford University, E*PUBLIC has made continuing contributions to the improvement of English proficiency among Koreans. And, through an exclusive contract with the world’ s largest publisher of medical books, Elsevier, E*PUBLIC introduces new medical knowledge and textbooks to the general public as well as medical students in Korea.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Interforum Canada

1001 Boulevard De Maisonneuve E, Montreal, H2L 4P9, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Interforum Canada est un acteur-clé de la chaîne du livre au Québec. Trait d’union entre les éditeurs du groupe français Editis et les points de vente canadiens, nos équipes réalisent la diffusion, la commercialisation et la promotion des ouvrages qui nous sont confiés. Elles assurent aussi la diffusion de plusieurs éditeurs québécois: Robert Laffont Québec, Gründ Québec, Les Herbes rouges, Kairos et Le Robert Québec. Interforum Canada est présent au Québec depuis plus de 30 ans, apparenté au sein d’Editis, filiale du groupe IMI. Nos ouvrages sont distribués au Canada par Socadis.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
EPUBLIC Korea
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interforum-canada-inc.jpeg
Interforum Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EPUBLIC Korea
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interforum Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPUBLIC Korea in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interforum Canada in 2025.

Incident History — EPUBLIC Korea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPUBLIC Korea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Interforum Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interforum Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
EPUBLIC Korea
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interforum-canada-inc.jpeg
Interforum Canada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EPUBLIC Korea company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interforum Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Interforum Canada company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EPUBLIC Korea company.

In the current year, Interforum Canada company and EPUBLIC Korea company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Interforum Canada company nor EPUBLIC Korea company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Interforum Canada company nor EPUBLIC Korea company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Interforum Canada company nor EPUBLIC Korea company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea company nor Interforum Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea company nor Interforum Canada company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Interforum Canada company employs more people globally than EPUBLIC Korea company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea nor Interforum Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.