Comparison Overview

Epix Gear

VS

American Bicycle Group

Epix Gear

692 Roundup Dr, Grand Junction, 81507, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Epix Gear was founded in 2008 with the mission to bring athletes exciting, unique, and performance-driven athletic apparel. After just 3 years, we have established a reputation for the innovative design and quality of both our customized and retail apparel. The Epix team is passionate about sport, and we love creating products that make a difference on race day. We understand what it takes because we train hard and race often. As we get stronger , our products do as well. We also believe in forming close ties to the athletic community, which Epix does through sponsorships of amateur athletes and events. We have a particular view in terms of design and performance, and we understand that our customers are the most demanding out there. Epix is a young company, which means we notice and care about each and every customer. We work hard to make sure you are happy with our products, and stand by them 100%....because the continuation of our story depends on it!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Bicycle Group

4126 S Creek Rd, Chattanooga, Tennessee, US, 37406
Last Update: 2025-11-22

We are innovators, engineers, designers and reps but most of all, we are riders. Making bikes is a dream job, but it’s still a job. Luckily, we have some of the most talented workers in the business. And if there’s a group of people who love and obsess over cycling more than you, it’s us. Our love for the sport carries into our business and we love sharing that with you! At American Bicycle Group we design, build, and manufacture Litespeed Titanium Bicycles, Quintana Roo Tri Bikes, and Obed Bikes. litespeed.com quintanarootri.com obedbikes.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epix-gear.jpeg
Epix Gear
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-bicycle-group.jpeg
American Bicycle Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Epix Gear
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Bicycle Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epix Gear in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Bicycle Group in 2025.

Incident History — Epix Gear (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epix Gear cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Bicycle Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Bicycle Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epix-gear.jpeg
Epix Gear
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-bicycle-group.jpeg
American Bicycle Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Epix Gear company and American Bicycle Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, American Bicycle Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Epix Gear company.

In the current year, American Bicycle Group company and Epix Gear company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Bicycle Group company nor Epix Gear company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Bicycle Group company nor Epix Gear company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Bicycle Group company nor Epix Gear company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Epix Gear company nor American Bicycle Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Epix Gear company nor American Bicycle Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Bicycle Group company employs more people globally than Epix Gear company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Epix Gear nor American Bicycle Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H