Comparison Overview

Episource

VS

HCLTech

Episource

500 West 190th Street, 4th Floor, Gardena, CA, US, 90248
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Episource is now a part of Optum. To stay up-to-date with news please connect with us at Optum.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 3,079
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

HCLTech

Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN, 201301
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 226,300 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around AI, digital, engineering, cloud and software, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work with clients across all major verticals, providing industry solutions for Financial Services, Manufacturing, Life Sciences and Healthcare, High Tech, Semiconductor, Telecom and Media, Retail and CPG, Mobility and Public Services. Consolidated revenues as of 12 months ending September 2025 totaled $14.5 billion. To learn how we can supercharge progress for you, visit hcltech.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 254,016
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/episource.jpeg
Episource
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcltech.jpeg
HCLTech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Episource
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HCLTech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Episource has 55.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCLTech in 2026.

Incident History — Episource (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Episource cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HCLTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/episource.jpeg
Episource
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Access to massive amounts of PHI
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcltech.jpeg
HCLTech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HCLTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Episource company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Episource company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HCLTech company has not reported any.

In the current year, Episource company has reported more cyber incidents than HCLTech company.

Episource company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while HCLTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Episource company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other HCLTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HCLTech company nor Episource company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Episource company nor HCLTech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HCLTech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Episource company.

HCLTech company employs more people globally than Episource company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Episource nor HCLTech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H