Comparison Overview

Epiq Systems (Private) Limited

VS

SandForce

Epiq Systems (Private) Limited

No. 372,, Welipillawa, Ganemulla, undefined, undefined, LK
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Epiq Systems (Private) Limited is newly founded Sri Lankan firm delivering latest technology to Sri Lankan customers by participating with top IT companies such as Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Cisco, Symantec, Kingston, SoftLogic and many more. We offer a cost effective IT solutions for companies and individuals seeking the very best in professional designing. As our mantra indicates "where technology lives", we dedicate to bring you new technology for you and your business. Our IT consultancy services can help your business utilise the benefits of IT to become more efficient, effective and therefore more profitable.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SandForce

46831 Lakeview Blvd, Fremont, CA, US, 94538
Last Update: 2025-11-27

On September 2, 2014, Seagate Technology acquired LSI's flash business from Avago, including the SandForce flash controller product lines. The former Flash Controller Division of LSI (formerly SandForce Inc., a leading provider of flash controllers for enterprise, cloud and client flash solutions and solid state drives) is now a part of Seagate.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 648
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epiq-systems-private-limited.jpeg
Epiq Systems (Private) Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandforce.jpeg
SandForce
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Epiq Systems (Private) Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SandForce
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epiq Systems (Private) Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SandForce in 2025.

Incident History — Epiq Systems (Private) Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epiq Systems (Private) Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SandForce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SandForce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epiq-systems-private-limited.jpeg
Epiq Systems (Private) Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandforce.jpeg
SandForce
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SandForce company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SandForce company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company.

In the current year, SandForce company and Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SandForce company nor Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SandForce company nor Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SandForce company nor Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company nor SandForce company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company nor SandForce company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SandForce company employs more people globally than Epiq Systems (Private) Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Epiq Systems (Private) Limited nor SandForce holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H