Comparison Overview

epigraf

VS

Prezify

epigraf

42 rue de Fleurance Toulouse, 31400, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Création d'identité d'entreprise : - création de logotype & déclinaison - création de charte graphique Print : - affiches (évènement, spectacle, campagne de sensibilisation) - flyers, leaflets & autres supports de communication évènementielle - plaquette d'entreprise - documentation commerciale - papeterie (cartes de visite, papier à lettres) - création d'illustrations (motifs T-shirts, linge de maison...) Web : - design du site (apparence) - développement du site web en HTML & CSS (site statique) - développement d'un site dynamique en partenariat avec un ingénieur informaticien - création de newsletter

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prezify

Oudegracht 259, Utrecht, 3511NM, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Prezify ontwerpt Prezi presentaties voor grote en kleine bedrijven waarbij het verhaal centraal staat. Daarbij begeleiden we het hele proces, van begin tot eind. Dit omvat onder meer ondersteuning bij het ontwikkelen van het verhaal, het ontwikkelen van een creatief concept en de vormgeving. Onder meer voor FrieslandCampina, Klant Contact Services, Ministerie van Buitenlandse zaken, Spiegelgroep, RSG Broklede, UMC Utrecht, ING Bank, Innovative Partners, Gemeente Almere, ABN AMRO. Daarnaast geeft Prezify presentatie-trainingen op het gebied van Prezi. De ervaring als presentatiecoach zetten we in om zowel beginners als gevorderden te tonen hoe ze Prezi het best kunnen gebruiken. Zowel open Prezi cursussen als incompany trainingen; onder meer bij Hogeschool Utrecht, BMW, Horizoncollege, Rabobank, Dudok Wonen, Gemeente Zaanstad, House of Performance, JMC Management Care, Provincie Noord-Brabant, Ballast-Nedam en Amnesty International.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epigraf.jpeg
epigraf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prezify.jpeg
Prezify
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
epigraf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prezify
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for epigraf in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prezify in 2025.

Incident History — epigraf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

epigraf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prezify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prezify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epigraf.jpeg
epigraf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prezify.jpeg
Prezify
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

epigraf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prezify company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prezify company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to epigraf company.

In the current year, Prezify company and epigraf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prezify company nor epigraf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prezify company nor epigraf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prezify company nor epigraf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither epigraf company nor Prezify company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither epigraf company nor Prezify company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds HIPAA certification.

Neither epigraf nor Prezify holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X