Comparison Overview

epay, a Euronet Company

VS

Broadridge

epay, a Euronet Company

3500 College Boulevard, Leawood, Kansas, US, 66211
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.epayworldwide.com

epay, a segment of Euronet, Inc. (NASDAQ:EEFT), is a leading global provider of payment processing and prepaid solutions that processed more than 3.8 billion transactions in 2023. The company has built an extensive network of retailer touchpoints with more than 800,000 point-of-sale terminals in more than 64 countries that connects brands with consumers all over the world. The company offers a diverse ecosystem of services, products and solutions supporting the distribution of Payment and Branded Payments for more than 1,000 brand partners via Commerce, eCommerce and mCommerce solutions.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 981
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Broadridge

605 3rd Ave, 41st Floor, New York, New York, US, 10158
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 800 and 849
http://www.broadridge.com

Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE: BR) is a global technology leader with the trusted expertise and transformative technology to help clients and the financial services industry operate, innovate, and grow. We power investing, governance, and communications for our clients – driving operational resiliency, elevating business performance, and transforming investor experiences. Our technology and operations platforms process and generate over 7 billion communications per year and underpin the daily trading of more than $10 trillion of securities globally. A certified Great Place to Work®, Broadridge is part of the S&P 500® Index, employing over 14,000 associates in 21 countries. For more information, please visit www.broadridge.com.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 16,809
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epay-a-euronet-worldwide-company.jpeg
epay, a Euronet Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broadridge-financial-solutions.jpeg
Broadridge
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
epay, a Euronet Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Broadridge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for epay, a Euronet Company in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Broadridge in 2026.

Incident History — epay, a Euronet Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

epay, a Euronet Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Broadridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Broadridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epay-a-euronet-worldwide-company.jpeg
epay, a Euronet Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Database Marketplace Forum
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broadridge-financial-solutions.jpeg
Broadridge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Broadridge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to epay, a Euronet Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

epay, a Euronet Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Broadridge company has not reported any.

In the current year, Broadridge company and epay, a Euronet Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Broadridge company nor epay, a Euronet Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

epay, a Euronet Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Broadridge company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Broadridge company nor epay, a Euronet Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company company nor Broadridge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

epay, a Euronet Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Broadridge company.

Broadridge company employs more people globally than epay, a Euronet Company company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Broadridge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References