Comparison Overview

epay, a Euronet Company

VS

Absa Group

epay, a Euronet Company

3500 College Boulevard, Leawood, Kansas, US, 66211
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749

epay, a segment of Euronet, Inc. (NASDAQ:EEFT), is a leading global provider of payment processing and prepaid solutions that processed more than 3.8 billion transactions in 2023. The company has built an extensive network of retailer touchpoints with more than 800,000 point-of-sale terminals in more than 64 countries that connects brands with consumers all over the world. The company offers a diverse ecosystem of services, products and solutions supporting the distribution of Payment and Branded Payments for more than 1,000 brand partners via Commerce, eCommerce and mCommerce solutions.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 981
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Absa Group

7th Floor, Absa Towers West, 15 Troye Street, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Absa Group Limited (Absa) has forged a new way of getting things done, driven by bravery and passion, with the readiness to realise growth on the African continent and beyond. We’re a truly African brand, inspired by the people we serve in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. We also have representative offices in China, Namibia, Nigeria and the United States, as well as securities entities in the United Kingdom and the United States, along with technology support colleagues in the Czech Republic.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 41,900
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epay-a-euronet-worldwide-company.jpeg
epay, a Euronet Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/absa.jpeg
Absa Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
epay, a Euronet Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Absa Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for epay, a Euronet Company in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Absa Group in 2026.

Incident History — epay, a Euronet Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

epay, a Euronet Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Absa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Absa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epay-a-euronet-worldwide-company.jpeg
epay, a Euronet Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Database Marketplace Forum
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/absa.jpeg
Absa Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Absa Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to epay, a Euronet Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

epay, a Euronet Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Absa Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Absa Group company and epay, a Euronet Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Absa Group company nor epay, a Euronet Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

epay, a Euronet Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Absa Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Absa Group company nor epay, a Euronet Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company company nor Absa Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

epay, a Euronet Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Absa Group company.

Absa Group company employs more people globally than epay, a Euronet Company company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither epay, a Euronet Company nor Absa Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.