Comparison Overview

EPAL, INC.

VS

Synechron

EPAL, INC.

None, None, Irvine, California, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 650 and 699

E-Pal is the leading platform for fun and entertaining teamwork and socialization services for gamers. E-Pal offers gamers the ability to hire and play with the most engaging gamers, creators, and pros to sharpen their skills, ensure safe, toxic-free multiplayer sessions, or just socialize and talk about shared interests.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Synechron

11 Times Square, Suite 3301, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 800 and 849

At Synechron, we believe in the power of digital to transform businesses for the better. Our global consulting firm combines creativity and innovative technology to deliver industry-leading digital solutions. Synechron’s progressive technologies and optimization strategies span end-to-end Artificial Intelligence, Consulting, Digital, Cloud & DevOps, Data, and Software Engineering, servicing an array of noteworthy financial services and technology firms. Through research and development initiatives in our FinLabs we develop solutions for modernization, from Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain to Data Science models, Digital Underwriting, mobile-first applications and more. Over the last 20+ years, our company has been honored with multiple employer awards, recognizing our commitment to our talented teams. With top clients to boast about, Synechron has a global workforce of 14,000+, and has 55 offices in 20 countries within key global markets. For more information on the company, please visit our website:www.synechron.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epalgg.jpeg
EPAL, INC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synechron.jpeg
Synechron
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EPAL, INC.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Synechron
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPAL, INC. in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synechron in 2025.

Incident History — EPAL, INC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPAL, INC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Synechron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synechron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epalgg.jpeg
EPAL, INC.
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synechron.jpeg
Synechron
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Synechron company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EPAL, INC. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EPAL, INC. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Synechron company has not reported any.

In the current year, Synechron company and EPAL, INC. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Synechron company nor EPAL, INC. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EPAL, INC. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Synechron company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Synechron company nor EPAL, INC. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EPAL, INC. company nor Synechron company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EPAL, INC. company nor Synechron company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Synechron company employs more people globally than EPAL, INC. company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EPAL, INC. nor Synechron holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N