Comparison Overview

Envoy B2B

VS

SS&C Technologies

Envoy B2B

678 Front Ave NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49504, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Envoy is a wholesale B2B platform for your entire team. No matter how large your business, our tools and services are designed to help you create dynamic content, increase your speed of sale, bring you closer to your customer, and excite your IT department. Envoy B2B provides the technology you need to empower your team and grow your wholesale business.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SS&C Technologies

80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT, 06095, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 20,000 financial services and healthcare companies, with over 25,000 employees and operations in more than 40 countries. Built upon a foundation of expertise, innovation and excellent customer service, SS&C powers some of the largest financial and healthcare firms in the world.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 23,515
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/envoy-b2b.jpeg
Envoy B2B
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ss-c-technologies.jpeg
SS&C Technologies
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Envoy B2B
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SS&C Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Envoy B2B in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SS&C Technologies in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Envoy B2B (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Envoy B2B cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” SS&C Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SS&C Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/envoy-b2b.jpeg
Envoy B2B
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ss-c-technologies.jpeg
SS&C Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Envoy B2B company and SS&C Technologies company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

SS&C Technologies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Envoy B2B company has not reported any.

In the current year, SS&C Technologies company and Envoy B2B company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SS&C Technologies company nor Envoy B2B company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SS&C Technologies company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Envoy B2B company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SS&C Technologies company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Envoy B2B company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Envoy B2B company nor SS&C Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

SS&C Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Envoy B2B company.

SS&C Technologies company employs more people globally than Envoy B2B company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N