Comparison Overview

Environmental Law Institute

VS

MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd

Environmental Law Institute

1730 M Street NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eli.org

The Environmental Law Institute (ELI) makes law work for people, places, and the planet. Since 1969, ELI has played a pivotal role in shaping the fields of environmental law, policy, and management, domestically and abroad. Today, we enter our fifth decade as an internationally recognized, non-partisan research and education center working to strengthen environmental protection by improving law and governance worldwide. ELI conducts research on a broad spectrum of issues, producing reports and offering policy recommendations on critical areas of environmental governance here in the United States as well as abroad. Capacity building programs for public officials, judges, citizens, and factory managers are a large part of ELI’s agenda. ELI educates and builds bridges among the various environmental stakeholders through our Membership Program, which convenes environmental professionals from all sectors and offers seminars on timely topics presented by leading experts and practitioners. ELI also advances innovative and pragmatic solutions to today's environmental challenges through various publications, including the The Environmental Forum®, ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter®, and ELI Press, our book division.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd

None, None, Edinburgh, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749
https://marfisheco.com/

At MarFishEco we pride ourselves on being able to help clients better understand the business impacts of their current activities based on clearly, pre-defined criteria. This can include supply chain efficiencies, return on investments of new technologies or how current practices match up with sustainability standards. We often take a simple counterfactual approach in which we make comparisons between what actually happens and “what would happen if” scenarios. We perform in-depth SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats) analyses and risk assessments to help guide clients towards a competitive edge by removing, minimizing or mitigating potential obstacles in their path to success. In this way, we help our clients make important decisions when it comes to their current expenditures, future investments, product portfolios etc, and how well they achieve either their own and / or externally imposed targets. For new technologies, processes or products, we help develop and implement projects with clear metrics to help clients easily assess where room for improvement may lie. The MFE team can help you design new monitoring protocols, analyze your data, provide periodic / mid-term performance reviews and plan strategy documentation for investors and stakeholders alike. Whether it is in person field visits or remote consultation, MFE has considerable experience undertaking monitoring and evaluation projects of varied sizes from single fisher projects through to international enterprises.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/environmental-law-institute.jpeg
Environmental Law Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marfisheco.jpeg
MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Environmental Law Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Environmental Law Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Environmental Law Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Environmental Law Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/environmental-law-institute.jpeg
Environmental Law Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marfisheco.jpeg
MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Environmental Law Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Environmental Law Institute company.

In the current year, MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company and Environmental Law Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company nor Environmental Law Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company nor Environmental Law Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company nor Environmental Law Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Environmental Law Institute company nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Environmental Law Institute company nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Environmental Law Institute company employs more people globally than MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Environmental Law Institute nor MarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References