Comparison Overview

Enterprise Print Group

VS

Peppermint Print

Enterprise Print Group

6234 Enterprise Dr, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

With over 30 years of experience in providing printing to Fortune 500 companies, we use Lean Manufacturing strategies to add value to your enterprise. EPG delivers printed components and processes designed to eliminate waste, increase productivity, and reduce spend. We take the time necessary to learn your business and create a plan that is both methodical and measurable.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Peppermint Print

1 Querns Business Centre, Cirencester, GL7 1RT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Peppermint Print – Litho and Digital Printers Gloucestershire UK Peppermint Print provides Print, Design, Direct Mail and Large Format services to businesses across the UK from our offices and production facilities in Cirencester, Gloucestershire. Established in 2005 to service the print requirements of local companies, Peppermint has grown steadily and now provides reliable, cost effective print solutions to UK wide businesses. We pride ourselves on building on-going working relationships with our clients, providing them with a professional service whether the organisation is large or small. We print for many business sectors including manufacturing, financial services, design agencies and local authorities to name a few. Offering both Digital and Litho print, full finishing services and studio support in house, we are ideally placed to manage both one off jobs through to on-going complex projects. Our experienced team have a thorough understanding of the print industry, from our graphics studio to our estimating, print room and finishing departments; quality and service are paramount and an integral part of everything we do. We design and print an extensive range of items from business stationery to promotional literature with many clients choosing Peppermint for all their marketing support needs. Our direct mail and design capability continues to grow with the addition of skilled staff, variable data technology and our Solutions brand that provides web design and digital marketing services. To discuss any future project please get in touch via our contact page or by phone on 01285 658123. Alternatively come and visit us (by prior appointment) at our Cirencester base.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enterprise-print-group.jpeg
Enterprise Print Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peppermint-print.jpeg
Peppermint Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enterprise Print Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peppermint Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enterprise Print Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peppermint Print in 2025.

Incident History — Enterprise Print Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enterprise Print Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peppermint Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peppermint Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enterprise-print-group.jpeg
Enterprise Print Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peppermint-print.jpeg
Peppermint Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Peppermint Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enterprise Print Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Peppermint Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enterprise Print Group company.

In the current year, Peppermint Print company and Enterprise Print Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Peppermint Print company nor Enterprise Print Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Peppermint Print company nor Enterprise Print Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Peppermint Print company nor Enterprise Print Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enterprise Print Group company nor Peppermint Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Enterprise Print Group company nor Peppermint Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Enterprise Print Group company employs more people globally than Peppermint Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enterprise Print Group nor Peppermint Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N