Comparison Overview

Enterprise Mobility

VS

Royal Caribbean Group

Enterprise Mobility

600 Corporate Park Drive, St. Louis, Missouri, 63105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

At Enterprise Mobility™ we are paving a new way forward by creating better experiences for how we move. We give people around the world the ability to connect in ways that suit their unique needs. It’s a bold idea that has defined our purpose-led, people-first organization for over 65 years, and it’s one that we continue to strive toward with every journey. Through our trusted brands and our portfolio of offerings, we aim to reach the highest levels of customer service with each interaction. And we invest in — and care about — each other, our communities and every journey. It’s a point of pride and distinction, rooted in our origins. It’s how we grew from a pioneer with a fleet of seven cars to a global mobility leader with more than 90,000 team members around the world. And it’s what will continue to drive the future of the organization and mobility itself. Over the years, we’ve learned moving forward isn’t a simple matter of going from point A to B. Today, mobility is the movement of people and goods. It goes beyond the vehicles we drive to encompass an integrated way of travel that meets every individual’s unique needs and preferences. That is why it’s our vision to be the world’s best and most trusted mobility company. As mobility continues to evolve, we'll continue to innovate to work toward a reimagined mobility future that is more accessible, efficient and sustainable for all.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 64,778
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group 1050 Caribbean Way Miami, None, Miami, Florida, US, 2312
Last Update: 2025-11-22

At Royal Caribbean Group, we deliver unforgettable vacations to guests who trust us with life’s greatest moments. We build the best ships, and even better careers, all while doing the right thing. We are passionate. We are innovative. We are unstoppable. We open the world to our employees. Your journey is our journey — chart your own course. Journey with us! Our culture: What sets the Group apart is the multicultural environment we create with employees from over 126 countries. We cultivate a workplace where employees feel they can be themselves, are appreciated because of their differences and are empowered to become part of the fabric of the Group. We have been repeatedly recognized by the Ethisphere Institute as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies. For us, it’s a simple three-word phrase: Make good choices. Our employees have a commitment to compliance, doing the right thing and integrity.  Our brands: Royal Caribbean Group (NYSE: RCL) is a cruise vacation company comprised of three award-winning global brands: Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, and Silversea Cruises. Royal Caribbean Group is also a 50% owner of a joint venture that operates TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd Cruises. Together, our brands operate a global fleet traveling to more than 800 destinations worldwide. Our promise: We deliver the best vacation experiences, responsibly. Every one of our values and actions flows from this promise. To operate the safest ships on the seas. To protect the oceans we sail. To put people and communities first in everything we do. Find out more here - https://www.royalcaribbeangroup.com/bluegreenpromise/ Link to the careers page: https://careers.royalcaribbeangroup.com/

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 42,399
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enterprise-holdings-inc-.jpeg
Enterprise Mobility
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-caribbean-group.jpeg
Royal Caribbean Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enterprise Mobility
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Caribbean Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enterprise Mobility in 2025.

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Caribbean Group in 2025.

Incident History — Enterprise Mobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enterprise Mobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Caribbean Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Caribbean Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enterprise-holdings-inc-.jpeg
Enterprise Mobility
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-caribbean-group.jpeg
Royal Caribbean Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access (Email Account Compromise)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Royal Caribbean Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enterprise Mobility company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Royal Caribbean Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Enterprise Mobility company has not reported any.

In the current year, Royal Caribbean Group company and Enterprise Mobility company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Caribbean Group company nor Enterprise Mobility company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Royal Caribbean Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Enterprise Mobility company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Royal Caribbean Group company nor Enterprise Mobility company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enterprise Mobility company nor Royal Caribbean Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Enterprise Mobility company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Royal Caribbean Group company.

Enterprise Mobility company employs more people globally than Royal Caribbean Group company, reflecting its scale as a Travel Arrangements.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enterprise Mobility nor Royal Caribbean Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H