Comparison Overview

ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG

VS

Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.

ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG

Europastraße 2/1, Lahr, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 77933
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The companies forming part of the ENTECCOgroup manufacture highly effective and efficient filter products, and use them to create turnkey systems for dust removal, exhaust gas purification, and ventilation in virtually every industry and in addition complete painting- systems. Our services also involve supplying power and other public utilities for production plants, including heat recovery systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.

75 Saskatchewan Ave, Devon, Alberta, CA, T9G 1E5
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Practical approach; Professional quality. Rus-Tec Engineering applies a broad range of field experience and outside-the-box thinking to develop targeted solutions for our clients. We have built our company on strong relationships and achieve quality results. We believe that a hands-on approach, a willingness to challenge the industry norm, and a commitment to integrity and quality will ensure our customers appreciate both the process and the results of working with Rus-Tec Engineering.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enteccogroup-gmbh-co-kg.jpeg
ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rus-tec-engineering-ltd..jpeg
Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enteccogroup-gmbh-co-kg.jpeg
ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rus-tec-engineering-ltd..jpeg
Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company.

In the current year, Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company and ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company nor ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company nor ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company nor ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company.

ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG company employs more people globally than Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ENTECCOgroup gmbh & Co. KG nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H