Comparison Overview

Enovatek Technology Services

VS

Zebra Technologies

Enovatek Technology Services

#4/11, Hosur Main Road, Bangalore, 560068, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-04

Enovatek provides a total range of Repair and Refurbishment services to OEM's in IT / Banking & Retail / Security Automation / Power Electronics segments. Enovatek's standard high-quality service portfolio and tailor made service-offering is unique and aims at full customer satisfaction. Enovatek's standard services vary from Single Part Repairs to a full all-in service offer.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zebra Technologies

3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, IL, US, 60069
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Zebra provides the foundation for intelligent operations with an award-winning portfolio of connected frontline, asset visibility and automation solutions. Organizations globally across retail, manufacturing, transportation, logistics, healthcare, and other industries rely on us to deliver outcomes today while driving innovation for what’s next. Together with our partners, we create new ways of working that improve productivity and empower organizations to be better every day. Learn more at www.zebra.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,660
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enovatek-technology-services.jpeg
Enovatek Technology Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enovatek Technology Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zebra Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enovatek Technology Services in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zebra Technologies in 2026.

Incident History — Enovatek Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enovatek Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zebra Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zebra Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enovatek-technology-services.jpeg
Enovatek Technology Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zebra Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enovatek Technology Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zebra Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enovatek Technology Services company.

In the current year, Zebra Technologies company and Enovatek Technology Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zebra Technologies company nor Enovatek Technology Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zebra Technologies company nor Enovatek Technology Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zebra Technologies company nor Enovatek Technology Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zebra Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Enovatek Technology Services company.

Zebra Technologies company employs more people globally than Enovatek Technology Services company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enovatek Technology Services nor Zebra Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H