Comparison Overview

Ennis, Inc.

VS

Codus Holdings Limited

Ennis, Inc.

2441 Presidential Pkwy, Midlothian, TX, US, 76065
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ennis.com

Ennis, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and sale of business forms and other business products in North America. The Print segment designs, manufactures, and sells business forms and printed business products including snap sets, continuous forms, laser cut sheets, tags, labels, envelopes, integrated products, jumbo rolls, and pressure sensitive products. As one of the largest providers of financial and security documents, presentation and document folders, promotional products, and advertising concept products are also produced in over 50 locations. Many facilities also provide warehousing, kitting and fulfillment. The Print segment also offers point of purchase advertising for large franchise and fast food chains. Ennis sells its products through independent dealers, including business forms distributors, stationers, printers, computer software developers, and advertising agencies in the United States. The company, formerly known as Ennis Business Forms, Inc., was founded in 1909. Ennis, Inc. (NYSE:EBF) is headquartered in Midlothian, Texas.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 312
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Codus Holdings Limited

2 Sophouli Street, Nicosia, CY, 1096
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.codusdpl.com

For technical reasons it has proved very difficult to print onto leather in a way that maintains the key characteristics of the product. Ink simply does not bond well to the non-uniform, organic, complex substrate. Codus Holdings Limited has patents pending for the world's first 'fit for purpose, state-of-the-art, digital industrial leather printing machine and process'. There are many traditional ways to finish leather; dyeing, embossing with a grain, foil embossing, brushing, buffing, hand painting, staining etc. But there is no traditional way to put a high definition, multi-coloured image onto leather robustly on a commercial scale. In recent decades there have been advances in print technologies and there have been and continue to be attempts to print leather. The problem is that most existing processes are 'adapted' surface print technologies, where the ink does not bond easily. Based on extensive research of other leather printing technologies, we believe our process is unique. We fuse the image to the leather. The ink drops are embedded into the surface of the leather using our proprietary technology. The full colour image is stable, robust and colourfast without the need for characteristic impeding coatings. And we can do this at very high definition (over 1,400 dpi). We lead the way in terms of quality, robustness, definition and fastness with the introduction of Codus ImageFuse® Technology.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ennis-inc..jpeg
Ennis, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codus-holdings-limited.jpeg
Codus Holdings Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ennis, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Codus Holdings Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ennis, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Codus Holdings Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Ennis, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ennis, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Codus Holdings Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Codus Holdings Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ennis-inc..jpeg
Ennis, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codus-holdings-limited.jpeg
Codus Holdings Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Codus Holdings Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ennis, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Codus Holdings Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ennis, Inc. company.

In the current year, Codus Holdings Limited company and Ennis, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Codus Holdings Limited company nor Ennis, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Codus Holdings Limited company nor Ennis, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Codus Holdings Limited company nor Ennis, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ennis, Inc. company nor Codus Holdings Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ennis, Inc. company nor Codus Holdings Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ennis, Inc. company employs more people globally than Codus Holdings Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ennis, Inc. nor Codus Holdings Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References