Comparison Overview

ENGlobal

VS

Petrobras

ENGlobal

11740 Katy Fwy, Houston, Texas, 77079, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 550 and 599

Who We Are ENG Founded in 1985, ENGlobal (NASDAQ: ENG) is a specialty engineering services firm that focuses on automation solutions and select EPCM projects for the energy industry and markets throughout the world. Our Automation segment specializes in integrated services related to the design, fabrication and implementation of advanced automation, control, instrumentation and process analytical systems. The EPCM segment provides consulting services for the development, management and execution of projects requiring professional engineering, construction management, and related support services. Markets Served: • Upstream • Midstream • Downstream • Pulp and Paper • Alternative Energy • Government Core Values: • HSE (Health, Safety and Environment) commitment • Integrity and Accountability always • Teamwork in all we do • Quality throughout • Communication from the start Vision: Our vision is to become the preferred provider of innovative automation integration services and select EPCM projects to clients across the globe. Mission Statement: Our mission is to safely deliver solutions that ensure success for all stakeholders, while demonstrating good stewardship of the world around us.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 1,145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Petrobras

Avenida República do Chile, n. 65, Centro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR, 20031-912
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Nosso propósito é prover energia que assegure prosperidade de forma ética, justa, segura e competitiva. Queremos ser a melhor empresa diversificada e integrada de energia na geração de valor, construindo um mundo mais sustentável, conciliando o foco em óleo e gás com a diversificação em negócios de baixo carbono (inclusive produtos petroquímicos e fertilizantes), sustentabilidade, segurança, respeito ao meio ambiente e atenção total às pessoas. Saiba mais em petrobras.com.br

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 53,942
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/englobal.jpeg
ENGlobal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petrobras.jpeg
Petrobras
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ENGlobal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Petrobras
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENGlobal in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Petrobras has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — ENGlobal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENGlobal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Petrobras (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Petrobras cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/englobal.jpeg
ENGlobal
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unauthorized IT system access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petrobras.jpeg
Petrobras
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data exfiltration for competitive advantage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Petrobras company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ENGlobal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ENGlobal company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Petrobras company.

In the current year, Petrobras company has reported more cyber incidents than ENGlobal company.

Both Petrobras company and ENGlobal company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Neither Petrobras company nor ENGlobal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Petrobras company nor ENGlobal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ENGlobal company nor Petrobras company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ENGlobal company nor Petrobras company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Petrobras company employs more people globally than ENGlobal company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ENGlobal nor Petrobras holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X