Comparison Overview

English Touring Opera

VS

Atlas Performing Arts Center

English Touring Opera

120 Peckham Hill Street, London, undefined, SE15 5JT, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.englishtouringopera.org.uk

Since 1979, English Touring Opera (ETO) have visited more towns and cities than any other UK opera company. ETO’s commitment to delivering outstanding live opera productions to every region of England saw it visit 29 venues in 2019, challenging the the geographical barriers that many face in accessing live opera. ETO delivers industry-leading Learning and Participation projects which allow people of diverse ages, needs and backgrounds to experience, create and participate in opera. Alongside the five mainstage shows, every year the company tours two specially commissioned operas for children and young people with special educational needs, a series of creative workshops for older people with dementia, and more than 70 workshops for people of all abilities and ages. Altogether, ETO’s work reaches over 50,000 people every year.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Atlas Performing Arts Center

1333 H Street, NE, Washington, District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2026-03-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atlasarts.org

The Atlas Performing Arts Center (APAC) is home for adventurous audiences, artists and ideas — presenting contemporary music, film, dance, theatre and performing arts unlike anywhere in the city. An artistic anchor in Washington, DC’s historic H Street NE corridor, the Atlas is committed to its neighborhood and the arts community. This page will post employment announcements, internship and volunteer openings, and other opportunities at APAC.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/english-touring-opera.jpeg
English Touring Opera
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-performing-arts-center.jpeg
Atlas Performing Arts Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
English Touring Opera
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlas Performing Arts Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for English Touring Opera in 2026.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Performing Arts Center in 2026.

Incident History — English Touring Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

English Touring Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlas Performing Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Performing Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/english-touring-opera.jpeg
English Touring Opera
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-performing-arts-center.jpeg
Atlas Performing Arts Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both English Touring Opera company and Atlas Performing Arts Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Atlas Performing Arts Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to English Touring Opera company.

In the current year, Atlas Performing Arts Center company and English Touring Opera company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center company nor English Touring Opera company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center company nor English Touring Opera company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlas Performing Arts Center company nor English Touring Opera company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither English Touring Opera company nor Atlas Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither English Touring Opera company nor Atlas Performing Arts Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

English Touring Opera company employs more people globally than Atlas Performing Arts Center company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither English Touring Opera nor Atlas Performing Arts Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References