Comparison Overview

Enginuity Consulting Ltd.

VS

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting

Enginuity Consulting Ltd.

8059 North Fraser Way, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5J 5M8, CA
Last Update: 2026-04-04

Enginuity Consulting Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary consulting company providing engineering design solutions and project management services through various project stages across North America. Our niche is to deliver engineering and project management services to the light and heavy industrial sectors; and Our mission, to provide value service by integrating with our clients to deliver results. At Enginuity, we work closely with our clients to identify specific needs to ensure all requirements are met through providing a variety of services to better accommodate demands. Services for new development, expansion and maintenance projects are offered: 1. As provider of complete turn-key projects 2. Through project management and strategic-sourcing 3. As explicit consultants for feasibility, design/build, or commissioning scopes 4. As a provider of specialized technical solutions Typical Projects we undertake: 1. Facility expansion & Upgrades 2. Turn-key facility design and management 3. Plant relocation & reconsolidation 4. Maintenance and operations projects 5. Facility Inspections 6. Asset condition reviews 7. Cost/benefit & Payback analysis What Industries we serve: 1. Ports & Terminals 2. Food & Beverage 3. Pharmaceuticals 4. Concrete & Aggregates 5. Mining & Metals 6. Chemical Processing 7. Manufacturing 8. Municipal 9. Warehousing & Logistics 10. Power & Utilities

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting

30 Raglan Road, Auburn, 2144, AU
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Brendma is the largest 100% family owned and operated light weight conveyor belting specialists in Australia. When you work with Brendma, you can be sure you’ll get the right solution for your needs. Since we are an independent Australian owned company, you are not restricted to the limited range provided by any single foreign-owned company. You are free to select the best quality, most appropriate product for your specific application.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enginuity-consulting-ltd-.jpeg
Enginuity Consulting Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brendma-australia-p-l.jpeg
Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enginuity Consulting Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enginuity Consulting Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting in 2026.

Incident History — Enginuity Consulting Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enginuity Consulting Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enginuity-consulting-ltd-.jpeg
Enginuity Consulting Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brendma-australia-p-l.jpeg
Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company.

In the current year, Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company and Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company nor Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company nor Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company nor Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company employs more people globally than Enginuity Consulting Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enginuity Consulting Ltd. nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H