Comparison Overview

Engineering Group

VS

Ingram Micro

Engineering Group

Piazzale dell'agricoltura, 24, Roma, 00144, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Engineering Group is the Digital Transformation Company, leader in Italy and expanding its global footprint, with around 14,000 associates and with over 80 offices spread across Europe, the United States, and South America and global delivery. The Engineering Group, consisting of over 70 companies in 21 countries, has been supporting the continuous evolution of companies and organizations for more than 40 years, thanks to a deep understanding of business processes in all market segments, fully leveraging the opportunities offered by advanced digital technologies and proprietary solutions. It integrates best-of-breed market solutions, managed services, and continues to expand its expertise through M&As and partnerships with leading technology players. The Group strongly invests both in innovation, through its R&I division, and in human capital, with the internal IT & Management Academy. Engineering is a key player in the creation of digital ecosystems that bridge the gap between different markets, while developing composable solutions that ultimately foster a continuous Business transformation. In 2025, Engineering has achieved the Top Employers Italy certification, the result of a significant growth process for the company, which is constantly committed to enhancing HR policies to create a work environment centered on the well-being of people.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,814
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ingram Micro

3351 Michelson Drive, Suite 100, None, Irvine, CA, US, 92612
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Ingram Micro is a leading technology company for the global information technology ecosystem. With the ability to reach nearly 90% of the global population, we play a vital role in the worldwide IT sales channel, bringing products and services from technology manufacturers and cloud providers to a highly diversified base of business-to-business technology experts. Through Ingram Micro Xvantage™, our AI-powered digital platform, we offer what we believe to be the industry’s first comprehensive business-to-consumer-like experience, integrating hardware and cloud subscriptions, personalized recommendations, instant pricing, order tracking, and billing automation. We also provide a broad range of technology services, including financing, specialized marketing, and lifecycle management, as well as technical pre- and post-sales professional support. Learn more at www.ingrammicro.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 28,653
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineering-group.jpeg
Engineering Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingram-micro.jpeg
Ingram Micro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Engineering Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ingram Micro
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineering Group in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Ingram Micro has 455.56% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Engineering Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineering Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ingram Micro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingram Micro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineering-group.jpeg
Engineering Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingram-micro.jpeg
Ingram Micro
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial extortion (presumed)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Undisclosed attack vectors, DLL side-loading techniques, Process hollowing techniques
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Engineering Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ingram Micro company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ingram Micro company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Engineering Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ingram Micro company has reported more cyber incidents than Engineering Group company.

Ingram Micro company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Engineering Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ingram Micro company nor Engineering Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ingram Micro company nor Engineering Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Engineering Group company nor Ingram Micro company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ingram Micro company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Engineering Group company.

Ingram Micro company employs more people globally than Engineering Group company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Engineering Group nor Ingram Micro holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H