Comparison Overview

Engineered Handling

VS

Interstate Cold Storage, Inc.

Engineered Handling

200 E. Tremont Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.engineeredhandling.com/index.html

Engineered Handling is recognized nationally as a premier material handling systems integration provider. Our name is synonymous with quality, professionalism, and value. Engineered Handling will exceed the expectations of our customers, employees, and vendors so that we all will be mutually successful. We will design, sell, and install only the highest quality material handling systems in the United States.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Interstate Cold Storage, Inc.

4410 New Haven Ave., Fort Wayne, IN, 46803, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.interstatecoldstorage.com

The warehousing and distribution professionals of Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. treat you and your products to a world of cost effective, customized, door-to-door refrigerated services. Our distribution capabilities enable us to protect your products from the time it reaches our refrigerated loading docks until we deliver it to your customer. In between, we offer a comprehensive array of services tailored to your specific needs. With over 40 years of exceptional service, our family owned refrigerated warehousing company takes great pride in providing solutions to your business. We're committed to superior service and it shows!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineeredhandling.jpeg
Engineered Handling
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interstate-cold-storage-inc-.jpeg
Interstate Cold Storage, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Engineered Handling
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interstate Cold Storage, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineered Handling in 2025.

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Engineered Handling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineered Handling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineeredhandling.jpeg
Engineered Handling
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interstate-cold-storage-inc-.jpeg
Interstate Cold Storage, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Engineered Handling company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Engineered Handling company.

In the current year, Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company and Engineered Handling company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company nor Engineered Handling company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company nor Engineered Handling company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company nor Engineered Handling company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Engineered Handling company nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Engineered Handling company nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. company employs more people globally than Engineered Handling company, reflecting its scale as a Warehousing.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References