Comparison Overview

Engineered Handling

VS

ESS Group

Engineered Handling

200 E. Tremont Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19

Engineered Handling is recognized nationally as a premier material handling systems integration provider. Our name is synonymous with quality, professionalism, and value. Engineered Handling will exceed the expectations of our customers, employees, and vendors so that we all will be mutually successful. We will design, sell, and install only the highest quality material handling systems in the United States.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ESS Group

2006 Longwood Drive, Brenham, TX 77833, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Providing solutions is the key for ESS Group Material Handling and Industrial Storage Division. ESS Group takes pride in improving your storage efficiencies or providing process improvements to add value to your operation. ESS Group has talented staff of material handling professionals that will take your project from conception through start-up. We offer all of the up-front technical support functions including: Site Surveys, Space Utilization Studies, Operational Improvement Plans, CAD Drawings and Specification Support.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineeredhandling.jpeg
Engineered Handling
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ess-group.jpeg
ESS Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Engineered Handling
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ESS Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineered Handling in 2025.

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ESS Group in 2025.

Incident History — Engineered Handling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineered Handling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ESS Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ESS Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineeredhandling.jpeg
Engineered Handling
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ess-group.jpeg
ESS Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Engineered Handling company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ESS Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ESS Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Engineered Handling company.

In the current year, ESS Group company and Engineered Handling company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ESS Group company nor Engineered Handling company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ESS Group company nor Engineered Handling company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ESS Group company nor Engineered Handling company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Engineered Handling company nor ESS Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Engineered Handling company nor ESS Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Engineered Handling company employs more people globally than ESS Group company, reflecting its scale as a Warehousing.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Engineered Handling nor ESS Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N