Comparison Overview

Engineered Products

VS

Taylor RyMar Corporation

Engineered Products

13605 Juneau Blvd, Elm Grove, WI, 53122, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Founded in 1978, Engineered Products specializes in the sale of engineered components to original equipment manufacturers. Our award winning sales staff, with over 100 years of combined selling experience, services a wide range of industries including, but not limited to, small engines, power and hand tools, pumps and recreational vehicles.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Taylor RyMar Corporation

60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona, 85281, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Taylor RyMar Corporation is a multi-discipline engineering and design firm providing electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering services. TRC has three core divisions: Vertical Engineering and Design, provides complete design and construction administration services for mechanical, electrical, plumbing & fire protection building systems; Renewable Energy Engineering, provides photovoltaic systems engineering and consulting, and solar hot water systems design; Energy Services, provides a complete range of energy services consulting and engineering including commissioning and energy auditing. TRC has offices in Tempe, AZ and Flagstaff, AZ. Our professional staff includes registered engineers, LEED® Accredited professionals, certified commissioning agents, and auditing professionals. Our focus on providing exceptional service and exceeding client expectations has allowed TRC the opportunity to work with a highly regarded clientele and continues to open doors for new opportunities. TRC maintains several strategic alliances with other design professionals, giving us the capability to provide a seamless full service design package if advantageous to our client/owner. We have found these strategic alliances and partnering to give the owner the best final product by bringing together a team of the most competent and qualified individuals for the specific project.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineered-products.jpeg
Engineered Products
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-rymar-corporation.jpeg
Taylor RyMar Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Engineered Products
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Taylor RyMar Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineered Products in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor RyMar Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Engineered Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineered Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Taylor RyMar Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor RyMar Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineered-products.jpeg
Engineered Products
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-rymar-corporation.jpeg
Taylor RyMar Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Engineered Products company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Taylor RyMar Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Taylor RyMar Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Engineered Products company.

In the current year, Taylor RyMar Corporation company and Engineered Products company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Taylor RyMar Corporation company nor Engineered Products company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Taylor RyMar Corporation company nor Engineered Products company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Taylor RyMar Corporation company nor Engineered Products company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Engineered Products company nor Taylor RyMar Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Engineered Products company nor Taylor RyMar Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Engineered Products company employs more people globally than Taylor RyMar Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Engineered Products nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H