Comparison Overview

Engine Developments Ltd

VS

SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY

Engine Developments Ltd

Leigh Road, Rugby, undefined, CV21 1DS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Engine Developments Ltd is an independent engine design and manufacture company specialising in high performance racing engines and has been in business for 40 years. We have supplied racing engines to major car manufacturers as well as private teams and are well known for innovative design engineering and the ability to provide a cost effective service to our customers. Our core activity remains supplying engines to teams who race at the Le Mans 24 hours but we also provide engineering services on a consultancy basis to many different industries. Recent projects include assisting with the development of a diesel aircraft engine, the design of an air compressor rig, the design of bespoke crankshafts, pistons and re-engineering a cylinder head.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY

475 W CALIFORNIA AVE, SEBRING, Ohio, 44672, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Custom Engineered Industrial Hose, Calendered Rubber Products, and Tank Linings. For over 40 years, Salem-Republic Rubber Company has serviced OEM, replacement, and specialty markets by manufacturing custom engineered industrial hose and calendered products for a wide range of industries. •Hose I.D.s from 1/2″ to 42″ •Lengths up to 50′ for most hose, Jet Starter to 60′ Tank Linings available in thicknesses from 1/8” – 1/2” and widths from 37” – 56”.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engine-developments-ltd.jpeg
Engine Developments Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salem-republic-rubber-company.jpeg
SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Engine Developments Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engine Developments Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY in 2025.

Incident History — Engine Developments Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engine Developments Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engine-developments-ltd.jpeg
Engine Developments Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salem-republic-rubber-company.jpeg
SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Engine Developments Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Engine Developments Ltd company.

In the current year, SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company and Engine Developments Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company nor Engine Developments Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company nor Engine Developments Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company nor Engine Developments Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd company nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd company nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY company employs more people globally than Engine Developments Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Engine Developments Ltd nor SALEM-REPUBLIC RUBBER COMPANY holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H