Comparison Overview

Shirt Monkey

VS

Labelmatch

Shirt Monkey

Unit 4, Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 3PH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Our Story Shirt Monkey began printing in early 2013 with a single Brother GT-381 garment printer - building up a customer base and slowly increasing our daily printing levels. In early 2015 we upgraded our machines to the Kornit range, initially starting out with a single Breeze printer which was quickly upgraded to a Storm II. In early 2016 we took the huge leap and invested in our first Kornit Avalanche 1000 printer which has excelled the company to a whole new level. Late in 2016 we added our second Avalanche 1000 which has taken our daily DTG capacity levels to well in excess of 1000 units. Moving into 2017, will we be moving into new premises to allow for more base stock holding and the posibilities for increased investment and development. The new space is in excess of 10,000 sq ft and will be located just a few miles from our existing facility.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Labelmatch

126 W Streetsboro Street #14, Hudson, OH, 44236, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Since 1998, Labelmatch has provided label products to its loyal customers in North America. Through our network of superior manufacturers, Labelmatch serves hundreds of customers in markets including automotive, healthcare and retails manufacturing and distribution. We continue our commitment to traditional print and auto-id products while showing explosive growth in the digital label arena. Across the U.S., Labelmatch customers expect us to do exactly what we promise every single day. We promise to offer our years of experience while still being friendly. We promise quality products quickly and reliably. We love living up to these promises. Labelmatch customers love it when we do. Labelmatch - The YES Company

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eness-ltd.jpeg
Shirt Monkey
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labelmatch-com.jpeg
Labelmatch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shirt Monkey
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Labelmatch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shirt Monkey in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labelmatch in 2025.

Incident History — Shirt Monkey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shirt Monkey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Labelmatch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labelmatch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eness-ltd.jpeg
Shirt Monkey
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labelmatch-com.jpeg
Labelmatch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Labelmatch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shirt Monkey company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Labelmatch company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shirt Monkey company.

In the current year, Labelmatch company and Shirt Monkey company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Labelmatch company nor Shirt Monkey company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Labelmatch company nor Shirt Monkey company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Labelmatch company nor Shirt Monkey company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shirt Monkey company nor Labelmatch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shirt Monkey company nor Labelmatch company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shirt Monkey company employs more people globally than Labelmatch company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shirt Monkey nor Labelmatch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N