Comparison Overview

Energy Efficiency Council

VS

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Energy Efficiency Council

222 Exhibition St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

The Energy Efficiency Council is a not-for-profit membership association for businesses, universities, governments and NGOs. Founded in 2009, the Council’s members are diverse, but united by a common cause: building a sophisticated market for energy management products and services that deliver: - Healthy, comfortable buildings; - Productive, competitive businesses; and - An affordable, reliable and sustainable energy system for Australia. The Council’s job is to make Australia a global leader in smart energy management. To this end, the Council works with its members and partners to: - Drive ambitious government policy by advocating for smart energy management policies and programs that deliver for all Australians; - Support business decision making and growth with trusted, impartial information on energy so that businesses have confidence making the right energy management investments; and - Ensure quality with standards and professional development by supporting standards development and benchmarking for the sector, and training and professional development for professionals across Australia. The Council is a national organisation with headquarters in Melbourne.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget is a bipartisan, non-profit organization committed to educating the public about issues that have significant fiscal policy impact. The Committee is made up of some of the nation's leading budget experts including many of the past Chairmen and Directors of the Budget Committees, the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget, the Government Accountability Office, and the Federal Reserve Board. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/BudgetHawks Follow us on Twitter (@BudgetHawks) https://twitter.com/#!/BudgetHawks

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energy-efficiency-council.jpeg
Energy Efficiency Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Energy Efficiency Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Energy Efficiency Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget in 2025.

Incident History — Energy Efficiency Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Energy Efficiency Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energy-efficiency-council.jpeg
Energy Efficiency Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Energy Efficiency Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Energy Efficiency Council company.

In the current year, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company and Energy Efficiency Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Energy Efficiency Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Energy Efficiency Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Energy Efficiency Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company employs more people globally than Energy Efficiency Council company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Energy Efficiency Council nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X