Comparison Overview

Grupo Energisa

VS

Electrica

Grupo Energisa

Cataguases, Minas Gerais, BR
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

O Grupo Energisa tem na distribuição de energia elétrica a principal base de seu negócio. Com cinco distribuidoras no Brasil, das quais três na região Nordeste (Energisa Sergipe - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de Energipe, no Estado de Sergipe, Energisa Paraíba - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de Saelpa e Energisa Borborema - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de CELB na Paraíba), uma na Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais (Energisa Minas Gerais - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de CFLCL) e uma em Nova Friburgo, no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Energisa Nova Friburgo - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de CENF), abrange 91.180 Km² de área coberta. Ao todo, são aproximadamente 2,4 milhões de consumidores e uma população atendida de 6,7 milhões de habitantes em 352 municípios. Atualmente, mais de 5,0 mil colaboradores diretos e indiretos fazem parte das suas empresas.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Electrica

9, Grigore Alexandrescu street, District 1 Bucharest, RO
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Electrica Group is a key player in the electricity distribution, supply and production market in Romania, as well as one of the most important players in the energy services sector. As of July 2014, Electrica has become a company with private majority capital, listed on the Bucharest and London stock exchanges. Electrica is the only listed Romanian company in the field of electricity distribution and supply in Romania.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energisa.jpeg
Grupo Energisa
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electrica.jpeg
Electrica
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Grupo Energisa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electrica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Energisa in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrica in 2025.

Incident History — Grupo Energisa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Energisa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electrica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energisa.jpeg
Grupo Energisa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electrica.jpeg
Electrica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Grupo Energisa company and Electrica company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Electrica company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grupo Energisa company.

In the current year, Electrica company and Grupo Energisa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Electrica company nor Grupo Energisa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Electrica company nor Grupo Energisa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Electrica company nor Grupo Energisa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grupo Energisa company nor Electrica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grupo Energisa company nor Electrica company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Grupo Energisa company nor Electrica company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N