Comparison Overview

Enel Group

VS

TATA Power

Enel Group

Viale Regina Margherita 125 Rome, Italy 00198, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

We are a multinational company changing the face of energy, one of the world’s leading integrated utilities. As the largest private player in producing clean energy with renewable sources we have more than 88 GW of total capacity, including around 64 GW of renewables. Distributing electricity through a network of 1.9 million kilometers to 69 million end users, being the first private network operator globally, and proudly bringing energy to approximately 58 million homes and businesses. People are the heart of our energy: our Group is made up of more than 60,000 people operating in 28 countries and our work is based on our values of Trust, Innovation, Proactivity, Flexibility and Respect. Diversity and inclusion play a key role for us, leading to our being recognized in all three of the most prestigious indices and rankings that assess corporate performance on gender diversity at the workplace and beyond: the Refinitive Diversity Inclusion Index, the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index, and the Equileap Gender Equality Global Report & Ranking. Let’s shape the energy of the future together.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TATA Power

Tata Power, Bombay House, 24 Homi Mody Street, Mumbai - 400 001, Mumbai, IN, 400009
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Tata Power is one of India’s largest integrated power companies and together with its subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities, has an installed/managed capacity of 14,294 MW. The Company has a presence across the entire power value chain - generation of renewable as well as conventional power including hydro and thermal energy, transmission & distribution, and trading. With 5,434 MW of clean energy generation from solar, wind, hydro, and waste heat recovery accounting for 38% of the overall portfolio, the company is a leader in clean energy generation. It has successful public-private partnerships in generation, transmission & distribution in India viz: Powerlinks Transmission Ltd. with Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. for evacuation of Power from the Tala hydro plant in Bhutan to Delhi, Maithon Power Ltd. with Damodar Valley Corporation for a 1,050 MW Mega Power Project at Jharkhand. Tata Power is currently serving more than 12.9 million consumers via its Discoms, under a public-private partnership model viz Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. with the Government of Delhi in North Delhi, TP Northern Odisha Distribution Limited, TP Central Odisha Distribution Limited, TP Western Odisha Distribution Limited, and TP Southern Odisha Distribution Limited with Government of Odisha. With a focus on sustainable and clean energy development, Tata Power is steering the transformation as an integrated solutions provider by looking at new business growth in distributed generation through rooftop solar and microgrids, storage solutions, EV charging infrastructure, ESCO, home automation & smart meters et al. In its 108 years track record of technology advancements, project execution excellence, world-class safety processes, customer care and green initiatives, Tata Power is well poised for multi-fold growth and is committed to lighting up lives for generations to come. For more information visit us at: www.tatapower.com

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,962
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enel.jpeg
Enel Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-power.jpeg
TATA Power
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enel Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TATA Power
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enel Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TATA Power in 2025.

Incident History — Enel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TATA Power (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TATA Power cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enel.jpeg
Enel Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-power.jpeg
TATA Power
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Enel Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TATA Power company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TATA Power company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Enel Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, TATA Power company and Enel Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TATA Power company nor Enel Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TATA Power company nor Enel Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

TATA Power company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Enel Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Enel Group company nor TATA Power company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TATA Power company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Enel Group company.

TATA Power company employs more people globally than Enel Group company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enel Group nor TATA Power holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N