Comparison Overview

Enel Group

VS

Centrica

Enel Group

Viale Regina Margherita 125 Rome, Italy 00198, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

We are a multinational company changing the face of energy, one of the world’s leading integrated utilities. As the largest private player in producing clean energy with renewable sources we have more than 88 GW of total capacity, including around 64 GW of renewables. Distributing electricity through a network of 1.9 million kilometers to 69 million end users, being the first private network operator globally, and proudly bringing energy to approximately 58 million homes and businesses. People are the heart of our energy: our Group is made up of more than 60,000 people operating in 28 countries and our work is based on our values of Trust, Innovation, Proactivity, Flexibility and Respect. Diversity and inclusion play a key role for us, leading to our being recognized in all three of the most prestigious indices and rankings that assess corporate performance on gender diversity at the workplace and beyond: the Refinitive Diversity Inclusion Index, the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index, and the Equileap Gender Equality Global Report & Ranking. Let’s shape the energy of the future together.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Centrica

Maidenhead Road, Windsor, SL4 5GD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Centrica is an international energy services and solutions company, founded on a 200-year heritage of serving customers in homes and businesses. We supply energy and services to over 10 million customers, mainly in the UK and Ireland, through brands such as British Gas, Bord Gáis Energy and Centrica Business Solutions. Through our trusted brands, we deliver innovative energy and services solutions to help solve customers’ needs, supported by thousands of engineers and technicians. We are committed to energising a greener, fairer future.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 18,398
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enel.jpeg
Enel Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centrica.jpeg
Centrica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enel Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centrica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enel Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrica in 2025.

Incident History — Enel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centrica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enel.jpeg
Enel Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centrica.jpeg
Centrica
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2015
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Enel Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centrica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Centrica company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Enel Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Centrica company and Enel Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Centrica company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Enel Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Centrica company nor Enel Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centrica company nor Enel Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enel Group company nor Centrica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centrica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Enel Group company.

Centrica company employs more people globally than Enel Group company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enel Group nor Centrica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N