Comparison Overview

ENE

VS

Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts

ENE

PO Box 583, Rockport, 04856, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

ENE was founded in Rockport, ME in 1999 and has grown rapidly to 16 professional staff in offices in 5 different states/provinces and two countries. ENE is a respected leader in advancing climate change and energy, transportation and forest based solutions at the state, regional and federal levels in both the U.S. and Canada. ENE focuses on cutting edge issues; maintains a staff of interdisciplina ry experts; and grounds our work in credible research. We coordinate and build partnerships with advocates, business leaders, academics, and community groups. ENE identifies new opportunities to drive change and we do the hard work on the ground to ensure that policies bring real results. From channeling investments in efficiency that will save billions of dollars for energy customers to cutting diesel pollution in urban communities, building one of the region’s largest climate and energy databases to spearheading advocacy for the nation’s first GHG cap and trade program ---ENE is proud to be on the leading edge of policies that are bringing clean air, healthy environment and strong economy.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts

750 N Lake Shore Drive, 4th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60611
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts advocates for a legal system that is equitable, accessible, and fair to all people; efficient so justice is not delayed; and effective in seeking solutions to social injustices. We work to interrupt cycles of poverty, mass incarceration, and racial injustice perpetrated by all aspects of the legal system. We improve lives by improving the courts.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ene.jpeg
ENE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicagoappleseed.jpeg
Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ENE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENE in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts in 2025.

Incident History — ENE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ene.jpeg
ENE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicagoappleseed.jpeg
Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ENE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ENE company.

In the current year, Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company and ENE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company nor ENE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company nor ENE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company nor ENE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ENE company nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ENE company nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ENE company employs more people globally than Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ENE nor Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H