Comparison Overview

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

VS

Wayne Law Review

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

325 N LaSalle St, Chicago, Illinois, 60654, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.britannica.com

The Encyclopaedia Britannica Group is a global knowledge leader whose flagship products—from Encyclopaedia Britannica®, Britannica® Digital Learning, Britannica Knowledge Systems®, Merriam-Webster®, and Melingo®—inspire curiosity and joy of learning on multiple platforms and devices. Encyclopaedia Britannica, founded in Edinburgh, Scotland in 1768, marks its 250th anniversary this year. A pioneer in digital learning since the 1980s, the company today serves the needs of students, lifelong learners, and professionals by providing curriculum products, language-study courses, digital encyclopedias, and professional readiness training through its extensive products.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 399
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wayne Law Review

471 W Palmer Ave, Detroit, MI, 48202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749
https://waynelawreview.org/

The Wayne Law Review is dedicated to achieving the goals of publishing a high-quality legal journal; teaching valuable skills in writing, research, and legal analysis to its members; and providing an enjoyable law school experience to its members. The Review is operated by its student members with these goals in mind. These Bylaws seek to facilitate these goals by providing a framework for the operation and management of the Review. The Wayne Law Review is Wayne Law’s primary scholarly journal. The Review is published three times each year and contains articles, book reviews, transcripts, notes, and comments by prominent academics, practitioners, and students on timely legal topics. Law students both fully operate the Review and are responsible for its content. Junior and senior Review members produce the publication under the direction of a senior administrative board. Faculty advisors oversee the general operation. Review members receive two credits for each year of membership. To receive credit, students must work on the Law Review for at least one full year, but returning for a second year is strongly encouraged. During their first year on the Review, members are required to write a publishable Note and complete three source-checking and editing assignments. All student-written Notes are considered for publication in Review.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/encyclopaedia-britannica.jpeg
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wayne-law-review.jpeg
Wayne Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wayne Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wayne Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wayne Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wayne Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/encyclopaedia-britannica.jpeg
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wayne-law-review.jpeg
Wayne Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wayne Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wayne Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company.

In the current year, Wayne Law Review company and Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wayne Law Review company nor Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wayne Law Review company nor Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wayne Law Review company nor Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company nor Wayne Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company nor Wayne Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. company employs more people globally than Wayne Law Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. nor Wayne Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References