Comparison Overview

Enable Law

VS

Juripop

Enable Law

None, None, United Kingdom, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Enable Law is a specialist medical law, serious injury and mental capacity legal practice. Our team of over 100 individuals provide a high quality service specialising in medical negligence, serious injury and mental capacity. We are friendly, approachable, straightforward and constructive in our advice. Our clients can count on us in good times and bad. We are passionate about providing clients with a service which embodies the values that make us different: Genuine – our team comes from diverse backgrounds, however we are all united by a desire to help you achieve the best results. Expert – We have years of experience working in these fields and getting the best results for our clients. Members of our teams are accredited by the Law Society, AvMA, STEP and APIL. We are also recognised by charities such as Headway, CBIT, and the SIA for our work. Supportive – bringing a claim or requiring support when someone loses capacity can be a burden to the victim and their family, which is why we work with our clients to lighten that load. Sometimes just knowing that someone is fighting your corner makes all the difference. Enable Law is part of the Foot Anstey Group and are based in their offices across the south west, south coast and London. www.enablelaw.com

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Juripop

2006, rue Plessis, Local 300, Montréal, Québec, H2L 2Y3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Juripop est un organisme à but-non lucratif dédié à l’amélioration de l’accessibilité à la justice pour toutes et tous. Juripop réalise sa mission en offrant des services juridiques à coût modique aux personnes exclues de l’aide juridique, mais dont les moyens financiers ne leur permettent pas de retenir les services d’un.e avocat.e. Juripop réalise également des projets créatifs et novateurs à travers lesquels elle offre de l’information juridique gratuite, claire et personnalisée. Fondée en 2009, Juripop est aujourd'hui une référence en matière d'accès à la justice québécoise.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enable-law-ltd.jpeg
Enable Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinique-juridique-juripop.jpeg
Juripop
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enable Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Juripop
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enable Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Juripop in 2025.

Incident History — Enable Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enable Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Juripop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Juripop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enable-law-ltd.jpeg
Enable Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinique-juridique-juripop.jpeg
Juripop
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Enable Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Juripop company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Juripop company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enable Law company.

In the current year, Juripop company and Enable Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Juripop company nor Enable Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Juripop company nor Enable Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Juripop company nor Enable Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enable Law company nor Juripop company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Enable Law company nor Juripop company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Enable Law company employs more people globally than Juripop company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enable Law nor Juripop holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X