Comparison Overview

Empower

VS

Wells Fargo Advisors

Empower

8515 E. Orchard Road, Greenwood Village, CO, 80111, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.empower.com

Built on a foundation of trust, integrity and promise, we proudly serve over 71,000 outstanding organizations and more than 17 million individuals. ¹ We take great pride in helping people with saving, investing and advice, while providing them with the tools and resources they need to help reach their financial goals. We’re continuing to grow — and innovate — every day. Our mission is to empower financial freedom for all. That mission starts by delivering advice, personalized guidance and critical support. We strive to meet the unique needs of everyone we serve and embrace the opportunity to inspire them along their journey. Disclosures: https://www.empower.com/social-media/. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ¹ As of April 1, 2022.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 12,376
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wells Fargo Advisors

1 North Jefferson Ave., None, St. Louis, Missouri, US, 63103
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wellsfargoadvisors.com

With financial advisors serving our clients in all 50 states, Wells Fargo Advisors is headquartered in St. Louis. At the end of the day, we help our clients succeed financially. For us – our Financial Advisors and thousands of other team members – it's a commitment. It's about honoring our relationship with clients and being fully invested in their success. Investors’ needs are more complex now than at any time in history. There are the usual concerns that investors can plan for, but there are also those events when life happens. That’s why investors are increasingly looking for advice they can trust from a financial services firm which has experience and expertise, and an uncompromising dedication to its clients. Opinions and comments expressed by LinkedIn Members are those of the persons submitting them and do not necessarily represent our views. Additional guidelines can be found on wfa.com/social. Investment and Insurance Products are: * Not Insured by the FDIC or Any Federal Government Agency * Not a Deposit or Other Obligation of, or Guaranteed by, the Bank or Any Bank Affiliate * Subject to Investment Risks, Including Possible Loss of the Principal Amount Invested Wells Fargo recognizes and values the diversity of its employees, customers and business partners. EOE, M/F/D/V. Wells Fargo Advisors is a trade name used by Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC, Members SIPC, separate registered broker-dealers and non-bank affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company. © 2021 - 2025 Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. All rights reserved. PM-09182026-6068127.2.1 Wells Fargo Investment Institute, Inc. (WFII) is a registered investment adviser and wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14,565
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/empower-retirement.jpeg
Empower
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-fargo-advisors.jpeg
Wells Fargo Advisors
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Empower
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wells Fargo Advisors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Empower in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells Fargo Advisors in 2025.

Incident History — Empower (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Empower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wells Fargo Advisors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells Fargo Advisors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/empower-retirement.jpeg
Empower
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-fargo-advisors.jpeg
Wells Fargo Advisors
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Empower company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wells Fargo Advisors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Wells Fargo Advisors company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Empower company has not reported any.

In the current year, Wells Fargo Advisors company and Empower company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wells Fargo Advisors company nor Empower company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Wells Fargo Advisors company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Empower company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Wells Fargo Advisors company nor Empower company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Empower company nor Wells Fargo Advisors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Empower company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wells Fargo Advisors company.

Wells Fargo Advisors company employs more people globally than Empower company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Empower nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References