Comparison Overview

Employment Lawyers Group

VS

Cavendish

Employment Lawyers Group

13418 Ventura Blvd., None, Sherman Oaks, CA, US, 91423
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since 1993, Employment Lawyers Group has handled more than 1,650 separate California employment cases with a high rate of success. All employment cases for employees are taken on a contingency. We are only paid a fee when and if we win. We advance all costs. We handle Wrongful termination, Discrimination (age, disability, national origin, race, pregnancy), Sexual Harassment, Medical Leave Discrimination (FMLA, cancer leave), Unpaid Wages (unpaid commissions, prevailing wages, overtime), and missed meal break cases. If you are having a work problem with your employer on any employment issue, contact us to discuss your case and your options. In Southern California, we have offices in Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles, Gardena, Oxnard, Bakersfield, Tustin, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego. We handle cases in all parts of California and also have offices in other parts of California, such as San Francisco.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cavendish

4 Snow Hill, London, EC1A 2DJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Cavendish, we have over 40 years of experience providing expert conveyancing services, with a specialist focus on new build properties and shared ownership. Our team of highly skilled property lawyers have helped us build a reputation as one of the country’s leading conveyancing practices; trusted by our clients to provide expert advice, guidance and support — every step of the way.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/employment-lawyers-group.jpeg
Employment Lawyers Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cavendish-legal-group.jpeg
Cavendish
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Employment Lawyers Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cavendish
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Employment Lawyers Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cavendish in 2025.

Incident History — Employment Lawyers Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Employment Lawyers Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cavendish (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cavendish cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/employment-lawyers-group.jpeg
Employment Lawyers Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cavendish-legal-group.jpeg
Cavendish
Incidents

FAQ

Both Employment Lawyers Group company and Cavendish company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cavendish company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Employment Lawyers Group company.

In the current year, Cavendish company and Employment Lawyers Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cavendish company nor Employment Lawyers Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cavendish company nor Employment Lawyers Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cavendish company nor Employment Lawyers Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group company nor Cavendish company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Employment Lawyers Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cavendish company.

Cavendish company employs more people globally than Employment Lawyers Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Employment Lawyers Group nor Cavendish holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X