Comparison Overview

Empire Die Casting

VS

Hallite Seals

Empire Die Casting

635 East Highland Rd., Macedonia, Ohio, 44056-2163, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Empire Die Casting Co., Inc. we have a tradition of going beyond…well beyond…to exceed customers' expectations. At all levels, our people take ownership of the part they play in producing the absolute best aluminum or zinc die castings. Pride, commitment, and experience is why you should make Empire Die Casting Co., Inc. your die caster. Our mission statement says it all: Quality driven people, dedicated to producing the best product through continuous improvement in communication, training, and service. The Empire Die Casting Co., Inc. quality assurance system is ISO/TS 16949 & 9001:2008 & ISO 14001:2004 certified. Empire Die Casting Co., Inc. is totally committed to producing the highest quality aluminum and zinc die cast parts available today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hallite Seals

130 Oldfield Road, Hampton, TW12 2HT, GB
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Hallite gives you complete confidence in the performance of your hydraulic cylinders, producing premium seals, wipers and bearings of proven quality, and delivering them across the world. Hallite Seals International is an ISO 9001 accredited manufacturer and provider of Hydraulic and Pneumatic Seals and sealing solutions to the global fluid power industry. We operate worldwide with a number of major international companies - renowned for their commitment to engineering excellence. For over 100 years Hallite Seals International has been at the cutting edge of fluid power technology, manufacturing a wide range of rod / gland, piston, and static seals, as well as support and bearing components, for technically challenging applications, from a wide range of materials which include Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), Polyurethane (PU), nitrile rubbers (NBR) and Fluoro-elastomers (FKM).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 239
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/empire-die-casting.jpeg
Empire Die Casting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halliteseals.jpeg
Hallite Seals
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Empire Die Casting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hallite Seals
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Empire Die Casting in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hallite Seals in 2025.

Incident History — Empire Die Casting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Empire Die Casting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hallite Seals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hallite Seals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/empire-die-casting.jpeg
Empire Die Casting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halliteseals.jpeg
Hallite Seals
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hallite Seals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Empire Die Casting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hallite Seals company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Empire Die Casting company.

In the current year, Hallite Seals company and Empire Die Casting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hallite Seals company nor Empire Die Casting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hallite Seals company nor Empire Die Casting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hallite Seals company nor Empire Die Casting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Empire Die Casting company nor Hallite Seals company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Empire Die Casting company nor Hallite Seals company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hallite Seals company employs more people globally than Empire Die Casting company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Empire Die Casting nor Hallite Seals holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H