Comparison Overview

The Emotional Health CBT Clinic

VS

Dana Behavioral Health

The Emotional Health CBT Clinic

2100 Marlowe Ave., Suite 261, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3L5, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Emotional Health CBT Clinic has been providing quality services to the Montreal community since it was founded by Dr. Michael Spevack in 1972. We are the largest Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Clinic in Montreal, with a team of 15 skilled therapists treating 400-450 clients every year. Our clinic is affiliated with the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) and provides treatment to adults, adolescents and children. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) targets the thoughts and behaviors that affect our well-being and our ability to cope with stressful situations. The goal of CBT is to develop ways of thinking and behaving in a way that promotes higher self-esteem, increased mood and a richer quality of life. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ La Clinique de la Santé Émotionnelle fournit des services de qualité à la communauté de Montréal depuis sa création en 1972 par Dr Michael Spevack. Nous sommes la clinique la plus grande à Montréal qui se spécialise en Thérapie Cognitive Comportementale. Notre équipe se compose de 15 thérapeutes qualifiés qui traitent entre 400 et 450 clients chaque année, incluant adultes, adolescents, ainsi qu'enfants. La clinique est affiliée au Centre universitaire de santé McGill (CUSM). La thérapie cognitive comportementale (TCC) vise les pensées et comportements qui influencent notre bien-être et capacité de gérer les situations stressantes de la vie. La TCC a l'objectif d'améliorer l'introspection pour encourager de la bonne humeur et une meilleure estime de soi et qualité de vie. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Info/Coordonnés: 514-485-7772 • [email protected] • www.cbtclinic.ca Director/Directrice: Luisa Cameli, Ph.D. Office Manager/Coordonnatrice: Ruby Clark, B.A.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dana Behavioral Health

220 Reservoir Street, Suites 21 & 28, Needham, MA, US, 02494
Last Update: 2026-01-06

Dana Behavioral Health (DBH) has been delivering comprehensive mental health solutions for over three decades, supporting the growth and well-being of children, adolescents, adults, couples, and families in Massachusetts. With offices in Needham, Norwell, and Hanover, as well as telehealth options, DBH offers accessible care, accommodating clients with all commercial and most public insurance types. Beginning your mental health journey can seem daunting, but DBH strives to simplify the process, providing the necessary tools for meaningful change through a team of over 100 compassionate clinicians, including psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and more. They specialize in treating a wide range of conditions such as depression, anxiety, ADHD, bipolar disorder, PTSD, OCD, and various others. DBH provides personalized therapy across individual, couple, family, and group settings, employing evidence-based treatments to foster balanced mental health and improve relational dynamics. They also offer specialized services such as medication management, neuropsychological testing, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for depression and OCD, and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) for trauma and anxiety. Additionally, DBH’s nutrition and wellness service promotes mental well-being through holistic care, integrating dietary guidance with overall health strategies to support conditions like diabetes, obesity, and heart disease. As a premier mental health resource in Massachusetts, DBH ensures quick access to care, with appointments available within 48 hours. They are dedicated to connecting you to the right provider swiftly and efficiently. For more information or to schedule an appointment, visit danabehavioralhealth.org, call (781) 429-7775, or email [email protected]. Dana Behavioral Health is here to guide you to a healthier, happier tomorrow.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emotionalhealthcbtclinic.jpeg
The Emotional Health CBT Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dana-behavioral-health.jpeg
Dana Behavioral Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Emotional Health CBT Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dana Behavioral Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Emotional Health CBT Clinic in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dana Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incident History — The Emotional Health CBT Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Emotional Health CBT Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dana Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dana Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emotionalhealthcbtclinic.jpeg
The Emotional Health CBT Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dana-behavioral-health.jpeg
Dana Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dana Behavioral Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dana Behavioral Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company.

In the current year, Dana Behavioral Health company and The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dana Behavioral Health company nor The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dana Behavioral Health company nor The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dana Behavioral Health company nor The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company nor Dana Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company nor Dana Behavioral Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dana Behavioral Health company employs more people globally than The Emotional Health CBT Clinic company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Emotional Health CBT Clinic nor Dana Behavioral Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N