Comparison Overview

Emolbi

VS

BAE Systems, Inc.

Emolbi

483 N. Aviation Blvd, El Segundo, California, 90245, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Emolbi is an employee-owned aerospace consulting firm focused on the development and launch of cutting-edge satellites and advanced space technologies. Emolbi delivers engineering, program management, cybersecurity, and business operations capabilities to the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community. Our talented staff is backed by a strong leadership team that understands how to motivate and retain employees and solve full-spectrum acquisition needs for the Government. Every employee receives an ownership interest in Emolbi and it is important for all employees to feel vested in the future success of our company. Along with industry-leading salaries, Emolbi provides employees with great benefits, fun social events, and an incredible culture of inclusion and accomplishment. Emolbi was awarded a Zennie Customer Success Award in 2020 by Zenefits as an innovative and emerging small business.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BAE Systems, Inc.

2941 Fairview Park Dr, None, Falls Church, Virginia, US, 22042
Last Update: 2025-09-05 (UTC)

Strong

Improving the future and protecting lives is an ambitious mission, but itโ€™s what we do. BAE Systems, Inc. is the U.S. subsidiary of BAE Systems plc, an international defense, security and aerospace company headquartered in Arlington, VA, with locations across the country. BAE Systems employeesโ€™ dedication and commitment show in everything they create and deliver, including advanced electronic systems, cyber operations and intelligence analysis, combat vehicles, naval weapons, ship maintenance and modernization, and vehicle upgrades and services. How we work is rooted in purpose โ€“ a purpose to protect those who protect us, to unite our community of colleagues and customers, and to drive forward the growth and development of our exceptional team members. Connect your passion for making a difference to career full of purpose by visiting jobs.baesystems.com. BAE Systems, Inc. believes in the free exchange of ideas and encourages all visitors to its social media properties to engage in spirited conversation. We expect and encourage differences in opinions and perspectives, but we require a civil discourse. To that end, all posts and comments must: - Refrain from promoting partisan political causes. - Protect confidential, proprietary, embargoed or otherwise protected information. - Respect and protect intellectual property rights and permissions for artistic content. Further, BAE Systems will remove comments that do not contribute to a civil discourse. The following are examples of comments that will be removed: - Profanity, or any speech that is potentially denigrating or demeaning. - Violence, threats of violence, or implied violence. - Descriptions of illegal activity, or implied illegal activity. - Ad hominem attacks or personal insults. - Off-topic or demonstrably false information

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emolbi.jpeg
Emolbi
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baesystemsinc.jpeg
BAE Systems, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Emolbi
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BAE Systems, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emolbi in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAE Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Emolbi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emolbi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” BAE Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAE Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emolbi.jpeg
Emolbi
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baesystemsinc.jpeg
BAE Systems, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party/Vendor Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Emolbi company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to BAE Systems, Inc. company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

BAE Systems, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Emolbi company has not reported any.

In the current year, BAE Systems, Inc. company and Emolbi company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BAE Systems, Inc. company nor Emolbi company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BAE Systems, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Emolbi company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BAE Systems, Inc. company nor Emolbi company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Emolbi company nor BAE Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emolbi company nor BAE Systems, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BAE Systems, Inc. company employs more people globally than Emolbi company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.