Comparison Overview

EmmaWell

VS

ByWard Family Health Team

EmmaWell

Philadelphia, 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

EmmaWell partners with payers, employers, and healthcare providers who want to take a proactive approach to help pregnant people and new parents who screen at risk for a perinatal mental health condition. Our comprehensive digital program spans the pregnancy and postpartum journey and is designed to help manage existing symptoms of anxiety and mood disorders and ultimately prevent postpartum depression. ​The EmmaWell program includes unlimited access to a maternal coach along with personalized mental health support, guidance, and education from the start of your pregnancy through three months postpartum. For more information, please reach out to us at [email protected].

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ByWard Family Health Team

100 Marie Curie, Suite 300, Ottawa, ON, K1N6N5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ByWard Family Health (BWFHT) offers a range of services to registered patients and the general public. On average, 500 patients are seen each day at BWFHT and we receive 100 patient calls per hour. BWFHT staff consists of over 100 full and part-time employees as well as close to 90 health care professionals, offering care in the areas of Family Medicine (FHT), Specialty Medicine, Psychiatry, and other services. Physicians include family medicine as well as specialists in Gynecology/Obstetrics, Endocrinology, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics and Psychiatry. We are proud to also be a Family Health Team (FHT) with a mission to maintain and improve the health of our clients by providing a patient centered interdisciplinary health care team which delivers prevention, early identification, treatment, care, and support for acute and chronic disease management in an environment that is open and transparent to social, ethnic, or income factors.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmawell.jpeg
EmmaWell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uohs.jpeg
ByWard Family Health Team
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EmmaWell
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ByWard Family Health Team
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EmmaWell in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ByWard Family Health Team in 2025.

Incident History — EmmaWell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EmmaWell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ByWard Family Health Team (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ByWard Family Health Team cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmawell.jpeg
EmmaWell
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uohs.jpeg
ByWard Family Health Team
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both EmmaWell company and ByWard Family Health Team company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ByWard Family Health Team company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EmmaWell company.

In the current year, ByWard Family Health Team company and EmmaWell company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ByWard Family Health Team company nor EmmaWell company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ByWard Family Health Team company nor EmmaWell company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ByWard Family Health Team company nor EmmaWell company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EmmaWell company nor ByWard Family Health Team company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EmmaWell company nor ByWard Family Health Team company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EmmaWell nor ByWard Family Health Team holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H